> On 8 Jul 2020, at 08:45, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-12: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC
Hi,
This version should address the final comments from the IESG review.
Sara.
> On 10 Jul 2020, at 09:38, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the DNS PRIVate Exchange WG of
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the DNS PRIVate Exchange WG of the IETF.
Title : Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators
Authors : Sara Dickinson
Bob,
It looks like there is a bug in the datatracker
Please use https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-13.txt
-éric
From: Bob Harold
Date: Friday, 10 July 2020 at 16:26
To: Sara Dickinson
Cc: DNS Privacy Working Group , Eric Vyncke
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] I-D
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:41 AM Sara Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This version should address the final comments from the IESG review.
>
> Sara.
>
> > On 10 Jul 2020, at 09:38, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 1:40 AM Sara Dickinson wrote:
> > I suggest getting rid of use of BCP 14 entirely. There are only two
> SHOULDs in
> > the whole thing, and I don't think you need them.
>
> This point has been discussed a few times - the WG considered a few
> alternatives and this was
