Re: [dns-privacy] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing

2023-03-29 Thread Florian Obser
On 2023-03-29 17:57 +09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:29:46PM +0900, > Ralf Weber wrote > a message of 30 lines which said: > >> As I don’t think probing for secure transport is a good idea and >> hope that we will come up with better solutions that follows the DNS

Re: [dns-privacy] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing

2023-03-29 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:29:46PM +0900, Ralf Weber wrote a message of 30 lines which said: > As I don’t think probing for secure transport is a good idea and > hope that we will come up with better solutions that follows the DNS > delegation model. You mean the parent announcing the zone

Re: [dns-privacy] WGLC : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing

2023-03-29 Thread Ralf Weber
Moin! On 29 Mar 2023, at 17:57, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:29:46PM +0900, > Ralf Weber wrote > a message of 30 lines which said: > >> As I don’t think probing for secure transport is a good idea and >> hope that we will come up with better solutions that follows

[dns-privacy] IETF 116 hackathon on ADoT unilateral probing

2023-03-29 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
[Already sent on the list but, apparently, some people missed it and asked for it to be in its own thread.] Following the work done at the DNS table, during the hackathon: * PowerDNS Recursor implements unilateral probing (but not *this* unilateral probing, it differs from the draft, see the