Reviewer: Bron Gondwana
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the ARTART reviewer for this document. Apologies for the delay in sending
my review.
I found it very well written and easy to follow. It's clear why this guidance
is being written, and it's clear to me how to implement it.
My only
Thanks for the review!
On Sep 7, 2023, at 7:16 AM, Bron Gondwana via Datatracker
wrote:
> My only concern is that it does fall back very easily to cleartext, for a long
> damping period. As a protocol implementer myself, I would generally expect to
> retry something one or two more times over
Thanks for the review!
On Sep 7, 2023, at 3:49 PM, Tommy Pauly via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Tommy Pauly
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for
> draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing. These comments were written primarily
> for
> the benefit
Reviewer: Tommy Pauly
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for
draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing. These comments were written primarily for
the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s)
should treat these comments just like
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023, at 02:18, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Thanks for the review!
>
> On Sep 7, 2023, at 7:16 AM, Bron Gondwana via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> > My only concern is that it does fall back very easily to cleartext, for a
> > long
> > damping period. As a protocol implementer myself, I
On Sep 7, 2023, at 6:58 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2023, at 02:18, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> Thanks for the review!
>>
>> On Sep 7, 2023, at 7:16 AM, Bron Gondwana via Datatracker
>> wrote:
>>
>> > My only concern is that it does fall back very easily to cleartext, for a
>> >
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 7:15 PM Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2023, at 6:58 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> >> Are you proposing a shorter value for "damping", or a note saying "1
> day is just the suggested value, you might choose a shorter one if you
> want"? Or something else?
> >
> > I'm
