Re: [dns-privacy] Solving the problem

2014-11-25 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 01:34:17PM -0700, Watson Ladd watsonbl...@gmail.com wrote a message of 86 lines which said: Many of these PIR protocols are very efficient. Do you have more specific references? http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2010/cacr2010-17.pdf

Re: [dns-privacy] DPRIVE next steps

2014-11-25 Thread Tim Wicinski
On 11/24/14 5:26 PM, Melinda Shore wrote: On 11/24/14 1:05 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: I did not say a requirements document. I said the Problem Statement, and evaluation metrics. Neither are requirements. I've been concerned about the proliferation of problem statement documents (and use case

[dns-privacy] Problem statements and Process

2014-11-25 Thread Hugo Maxwell Connery
Hi, There seem to have been issues with problem statements. My two cents. Fix the Internet w.r.t pervasive monitoring will not lead, in 'reasonable' time, to concrete standards. Instead, groups are formed with a charter, including a limited scope of field for consideration. Other scopes can