> On 20 Nov 2016, at 16:36, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Here is a new version of draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-step-2 incorporating,
> I believe, all comments from the meeting in IETF 97 @ Seoul. Comments
> and discussions welcome.
Stephane,
Just wondering what the status of
> > I agree, I think an update to the draft referencing dkg’s work is the
> > best way to proceed. This seems a good topic for discussion in Prague.
> >
>
> I agree this would be a great discussion topic in Prague.
I'll spin a revision of the document, hopefully tomorroy - i think the doc
On 6/28/17 12:01 PM, Sara Dickinson wrote:
On 13 Jun 2017, at 08:37, Shane Kerr > wrote:
Alexander and all,
tl;dr Lets move forward with our best guesses now. dkg's
recommendations seem good, but maybe we can tweak these
> On 13 Jun 2017, at 08:37, Shane Kerr wrote:
>
> Alexander and all,
>
> tl;dr Lets move forward with our best guesses now. dkg's
> recommendations seem good, but maybe we can tweak these based on
> expected maximum packet sizes.
I agree, I think an