[dns-privacy] A different way to look at the problem

2015-02-19 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
DNS privacy requires us to make two changes to the DNS protocol. 1) The resolver is acknowledged as being a trusted service 2) Some form of crypto is added between the transport and application layer in the client-resolver protocol. So far we seem to have focused on the second issue. But that is

Re: [dns-privacy] A different way to look at the problem

2015-02-19 Thread Hosnieh Rafiee
Question: Is anyone proposing that we can achieve DNS privacy while maintaining the current practice of the client defaulting to the DNS server advertised in DHCP? Yes, cga-tsig *might* be an option but for DHCP security, it is dependent to SAVI-DHCP or any monitoring mechanism in the

Re: [dns-privacy] A different way to look at the problem

2015-02-19 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Ted Hardie ted.i...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker ph...@hallambaker.com wrote: DNS privacy requires us to make two changes to the DNS protocol. ​I'm a little confused as to why this isn't on DPRIVE, but