Re: [dns-privacy] A pool is not an onion

2014-10-26 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 07:35:11PM -0700, Watson Ladd watsonbl...@gmail.com wrote a message of 54 lines which said: Before DPRIV: anyone who owns the DNS box at an ISP can see all dns-queries go through, and know who made them. After: exactly the same. You seem to consider that DPRIVE =

Re: [dns-privacy] A pool is not an onion

2014-10-26 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Oct 25, 2014, at 7:35 PM, Watson Ladd watsonbl...@gmail.com wrote: Before DPRIV: anyone who owns the DNS box at an ISP can see all dns-queries go through, and know who made them. After: exactly the same. Why? Because we were lazy, and solved the easy problems instead of the worthwhile

Re: [dns-privacy] A pool is not an onion

2014-10-26 Thread Watson Ladd
On Oct 26, 2014 8:09 AM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote: On Oct 25, 2014, at 7:35 PM, Watson Ladd watsonbl...@gmail.com wrote: Before DPRIV: anyone who owns the DNS box at an ISP can see all dns-queries go through, and know who made them. After: exactly the same. Why?

Re: [dns-privacy] A pool is not an onion

2014-10-26 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 07:35:11PM -0700, Watson Ladd watsonbl...@gmail.com wrote a message of 54 lines which said: Before DPRIV: anyone who owns the DNS box at an ISP can see all dns-queries go through, and

Re: [dns-privacy] A pool is not an onion

2014-10-26 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote: On Oct 25, 2014, at 7:35 PM, Watson Ladd watsonbl...@gmail.com wrote: Before DPRIV: anyone who owns the DNS box at an ISP can see all dns-queries go through, and know who made them. After: exactly the same.

Re: [dns-privacy] A pool is not an onion

2014-10-25 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Watson Ladd watsonbl...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker i...@hallambaker.com wrote: I think that we have to go back to the original goal, to reduce leakage of information so that we only disclose where there is a need