On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 08:20:05AM -0800,
Tommy Pauly wrote
a message of 45 lines which said:
> However, there are a couple reasons we're interested in having DoH
> servers directly support receiving Oblivious queries:
Ok, but these reasons should be put in the draft (may be in an
appendix),
> On Nov 2, 2019, at 4:57 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:40:51PM -0700,
> Tommy Pauly wrote
> a message of 393 lines which said:
>
>> We've posted new versions of our drafts on discovering designated DoH
>> servers, and Oblivious DoH:
>
> If you want to
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:40:51PM -0700,
Tommy Pauly wrote
a message of 393 lines which said:
> We've posted new versions of our drafts on discovering designated DoH
> servers, and Oblivious DoH:
If you want to separate the knowledge of the source IP address and the
knowledge of the QNAME,
and on the GitHub. Some of the main
changes in these versions are:
- Don't reserve a SVCB SvcParamKey yet
(https://github.com/tfpauly/draft-pauly-adaptive-dns-privacy/issues/60)
- Change the Oblivious DoH proxying mechanism to specify the target in the HTTP
path query
(https://github.com/tfpauly
Hello DNS Privacy,
We’ve published a set of new drafts that define what we’re calling “Adaptive
DNS Privacy”. This is an approach to using technologies like DoH to improve
privacy of name resolution without breaking the functionality provided by local
network resolvers. It also does not
