Thanks, Stephane.
The article is excellent in discussing the intersection of privacy issues and
ICT. However, [o]nline and in privacy law alike, things are very crisp. Maybe
they are in Australia. However, one of the big challenges in the privacy space
is that definitions of PI, PII, and similar acronymed (word?) concepts vary
widely and may not be spelled at all in some jurisdictions.
I find it curious that Mr. Wilson makes such a categorical statement in this
article while linking to another post where he discusses definitional
uncertainties. http://lockstep.com.au/blog/2013/09/27/pii-or-not-pii. It was
worthwhile following his links to get a full picture.
Don
-Original Message-
From: dns-privacy [mailto:dns-privacy-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephane
Bortzmeyer
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 3:46 AM
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org; perp...@ietf.org
Subject: [dns-privacy] Privacy for engineers
Good reading about the blind spots of engineers about privacy:
http://lockstep.com.au/blog/2014/08/28/engineers-and-privacy
___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy