Re: [dns-privacy] DNS over DTLS

2016-12-01 Thread Shane Kerr
Tariq, At 2016-12-01 12:50:16 +0500 Tariq Saraj wrote: > My question is that, at one side "Specification for DNS over Transport > Layer Security (TLS) i.e. RFC7858" is a proposed standard now. > Whereas, on the other side in the "draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13", > The motivations for proposing DN

[dns-privacy] The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile in state "Adopted by a WG"

2016-12-01 Thread IETF Secretariat
The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile in state Adopted by a WG (entered by Tim Wicinski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile/ ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-p

Re: [dns-privacy] DNS over DTLS

2016-12-01 Thread Tariq Saraj
Hi Shane, Thanks for your detailed reply, the point I am trying to highlight is the changes in TCP for DNS which is "TCP out of order packet delivery, i.e. the OOOP". On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Shane Kerr wrote: > Tariq, > > At 2016-12-01 12:50:16 +0500 > Tariq Saraj wrote: > > > My questi

Re: [dns-privacy] DNS over DTLS

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2016-12-02 01:22:40 -0500, Tariq Saraj wrote: > Thanks for your detailed reply, the point I am trying to highlight is the > changes in TCP for DNS which is "TCP out of order packet delivery, i.e. the > OOOP". I think you're referring to "out of order processing" for DNS requests by a recurs