IESG state changed:
New State: IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed
(The previous state was IESG Evaluation)
Datatracker URL:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy/
___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
Sorry to be commenting so late in the process...
Was the strategy of "MTU(-ish) maximum padding policy" ever suggested,
possibly as an alternative to Maximum Padding Policy?
IMHO, there are signifiant benefits, even beyond privacy:
- It addresses the issues on Random that Eric R raises
-
