[dns-privacy] DNS PRIVate Exchange

ways known. It just a matter of couple of tries with domain names such as google, facebook, twitter, hotmail, yahoo and youtube etc. A simple xoring can return original key used for encryption. -- Regards Tariq Saraj Center for Research in Networks and Telecom

Re: [dns-privacy] DNS PRIVate Exchange

13, 2016 at 04:58:03PM +0500, > Tariq Saraj <tariqsa...@gmail.com> wrote > a message of 62 lines which said: > > > In case with DNS, plaintext is always known. > > No, it is not (otherwise, encryption would be pointless). > > > A simple xoring can ret

Re: [dns-privacy] More detailed documentation required for an end user understanding

ding DNS protocol, I don't see how to map the problem with the PII of end user. On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 03:39:54PM +0500, > Tariq Saraj <tariqsa...@gmail.com> wrote > a message of 70 l

[dns-privacy] DNS over DTLS

, why the community still need DTLS for DNS? -- Regards Tariq Saraj Riphah Institute of Systems Engineering, Islamabad ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Re: [dns-privacy] DNS over DTLS

case of > truncation. So adding DNS over DTLS is always an extra cost. It might > be that DNS over DTLS is worth the extra code and complexity, but I > think it is safe to say that we do not have enough operational > experience yet to know for sure. > > Cheers, > > -- > Shane > -- Regards Tariq Saraj Riphah Institute of Systems Engineering, Islamabad ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy