Re: [dns-privacy] DNS over DTLS

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2016-12-02 01:22:40 -0500, Tariq Saraj wrote: > Thanks for your detailed reply, the point I am trying to highlight is the > changes in TCP for DNS which is "TCP out of order packet delivery, i.e. the > OOOP". I think you're referring to "out of order processing" for DNS requests by a

Re: [dns-privacy] DNS over DTLS

2016-12-01 Thread Tariq Saraj
Hi Shane, Thanks for your detailed reply, the point I am trying to highlight is the changes in TCP for DNS which is "TCP out of order packet delivery, i.e. the OOOP". On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Shane Kerr wrote: > Tariq, > > At 2016-12-01 12:50:16 +0500 > Tariq

Re: [dns-privacy] DNS over DTLS

2016-12-01 Thread Shane Kerr
Tariq, At 2016-12-01 12:50:16 +0500 Tariq Saraj wrote: > My question is that, at one side "Specification for DNS over Transport > Layer Security (TLS) i.e. RFC7858" is a proposed standard now. > Whereas, on the other side in the "draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13", > The

Re: [dns-privacy] DNS over DTLS (DNSoD)

2014-04-24 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:16:29AM -0700, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote a message of 39 lines which said: Sure. What were the results of your testing? I quickly tested with .FR authoritative name servers and both NSD and BIND seem to silently ignore the incoming request. No

Re: [dns-privacy] DNS over DTLS (DNSoD)

2014-04-24 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Apr 24, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) tire...@cisco.com wrote: No, the draft states that the DNS server will send no response. Please refer to section 5 of the draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-dnsop-dnsodtls-00#section-5 snip After performing the