Re: [dns-privacy] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dickinson-bcp-op-00.txt

2018-03-13 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 01:46:34PM +, Sara Dickinson wrote a message of 192 lines which said: > Not sure, are you just suggesting we reference the terminology draft > or we switch to using ‘public resolver’ (which strictly speaking > isn’t defined there, just discussed)? I suggest we use

Re: [dns-privacy] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dickinson-bcp-op-00.txt

2018-03-12 Thread Sara Dickinson
> On 12 Mar 2018, at 10:31, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:42:10AM +, > Sara Dickinson wrote > a message of 198 lines which said: > >> There is a new draft (very much a placeholder at the moment) that >> attempts to start the discussion around Best Practices fo

Re: [dns-privacy] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dickinson-bcp-op-00.txt

2018-03-12 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:42:10AM +, Sara Dickinson wrote a message of 198 lines which said: > There is a new draft (very much a placeholder at the moment) that > attempts to start the discussion around Best Practices for Operators > of DNS Privacy Services. It is submitted here for initi