Re: [dns-privacy] Maybe a new URI scheme dnss: ?

On 17 Apr 2018, at 2:38, Erik Kline wrote: And looking at this thread I see I missed Stephane's response that perhaps I should have asked uri-review@. Having a full proposal (even if it is one that will be abandoned) is the best way to approach that list. I'm happy to work on that with you.

Re: [dns-privacy] Maybe a new URI scheme dnss: ?

On 13 April 2018 at 02:23, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 12 Apr 2018, at 9:59, Brian Haberman wrote: > >> Erik Kline posted about this about a month ago on this list. In general, >> I think this appears to have some interest behind it. > > > Gh, I can't believe I forgot

Re: [dns-privacy] Maybe a new URI scheme dnss: ?

On 12 Apr 2018, at 9:59, Brian Haberman wrote: Erik Kline posted about this about a month ago on this list. In general, I think this appears to have some interest behind it. Gh, I can't believe I forgot that, particularly given how recently it was. Apologies to Erik. And I'll work with

Re: [dns-privacy] Maybe a new URI scheme dnss: ?

Hi Paul, On 4/12/18 11:56 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings. RFC 4501 defines the dns: URI scheme. You can specify a host > and port number, but the assumption is that you are running DNS. Thus, > dns://1.1.1.1:853/example.com?TYPE=A does not mean "use DNS over TLS". > > I'm thinking of