On 7/12/19 2:35 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>> I think this may cause problems with later visualization tools. I think
>>> it would be good to add an optional "name" parameter (as with newServer).
>>
>> Yes, I agree the current situation could be improved, I have a few ideas
>> in mind for the next
Hi Remi!
Am 12.07.2019 um 10:27 schrieb Remi Gacogne:
> Hi Klaus!
>
> On 7/12/19 10:23 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> I think this may cause problems with later visualization tools. I think
>> it would be good to add an optional "name" parameter (as with newServer).
>
> Yes, I agree the current si
Hi Klaus!
On 7/12/19 10:23 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> I think this may cause problems with later visualization tools. I think
> it would be good to add an optional "name" parameter (as with newServer).
Yes, I agree the current situation could be improved, I have a few ideas
in mind for the next
Hi!
For performance reasons (it helps a lot) I have 3 listeners:
setLocal("0.0.0.0:53", { doTCP=true, reusePort=true, tcpFastOpenSize=100 })
addLocal("0.0.0.0:53", { doTCP=true, reusePort=true, tcpFastOpenSize=100 })
addLocal("0.0.0.0:53", { doTCP=true, reusePort=true, tcpFastOpenSize=100 })
/me