Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 hostname resolving

2014-04-07 Thread Quintus
Hi Simon, I think you may well be right. What happens if you look up the _address_, ie dig -x 2001:4dd0:ff00:8918:1:f858:930c:267b ; DiG 9.9.2-P2 -x 2001:4dd0:ff00:8918:1:f858:930c:267b ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 hostname resolving

2014-04-07 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/04/14 21:28, Quintus wrote: Hi Simon, I think you may well be right. What happens if you look up the _address_, ie dig -x 2001:4dd0:ff00:8918:1:f858:930c:267b ; DiG 9.9.2-P2 -x

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Per entry TTL override

2014-04-07 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/04/14 12:38, Olivier Mauras wrote: How much does a cache miss cost. Why bother tuning the TTLs and _still_ risking that you've made them too long and something breaks. Caching is an optimisation. If an optimisation can lead to