Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] No DHCP leases handed on bridge interface

2016-07-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Bonsoir Seb, Le Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:09:02 + (UTC) Sébastien Delafond a écrit: > On 2016-07-15, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > OTOH, there *is* a link with the networking setup since dnsmasq > > works without the bridge and stops working with the bridge.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] No DHCP leases handed on bridge interface

2016-07-15 Thread Sébastien Delafond
On 2016-07-15, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > OTOH, there *is* a link with the networking setup since dnsmasq > works without the bridge and stops working with the bridge. True. > Also, the fact tha ISC dhcp works might hinge on how ISC dhcp > listens to requests exactly vs.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] No DHCP leases handed on bridge interface

2016-07-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Bonjour Seb, Le Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:48:55 + (UTC) Sébastien Delafond a écrit: > On 2016-07-15, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > That leads to further questions, at least. VLANs do not cause > > problems for dnsmasq, but bridging VLANs may be tricky and

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] No DHCP leases handed on bridge interface

2016-07-15 Thread Sébastien Delafond
On Jul/15, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Just to make sure: "eth0.2" would normally denote a virtual interface > for VLAN 2 traffic on eth0. Are VLANs involved in your network setup? Hi Albert, the hardware is an ARM board using the roboswitch module: that basically uses VLANs internally, in order to

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] No DHCP leases handed on bridge interface

2016-07-15 Thread Sébastien Delafond
On 2016-07-15, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > That leads to further questions, at least. VLANs do not cause > problems for dnsmasq, but bridging VLANs may be tricky and more > prone to network misconfigurations. > > So just to make sure, can you list all interfaces and all

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] No DHCP leases handed on bridge interface

2016-07-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Bonjour, Le Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:39:37 +0200 Sébastien Delafond a écrit: > On Jul/15, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Just to make sure: "eth0.2" would normally denote a virtual > > interface for VLAN 2 traffic on eth0. Are VLANs involved in your > > network setup? > > Hi Albert, >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] No DHCP leases handed on bridge interface

2016-07-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Seb, Le Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:28:33 + (UTC) Sébastien Delafond a écrit: > Hello, > > I have a server with a bridge containing only one interface (ideally > it'll of course include more interfaces, but I've tried to eliminate > as many factors as possible): > > $ brctl

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq to provide public DNS service

2016-07-15 Thread wkitty42
also replied off-list... On 07/13/2016 08:21 PM, T o n g wrote: After struggled for a few days, I finally decided that I should reply, to bring some closure on this. Thank you for all these days of your tireless help. However, my conclusion is still the same as my first post -- dnsmasq is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSSEC and Mozilla domains not working

2016-07-15 Thread mmmfotografie
On 15-7-2016 1:13, mmmfotografie wrote: On 14-7-2016 23:22, Simon Kelley wrote: On 12/07/16 00:17, mmmfotografie wrote: On 11-7-2016 23:08, Simon Kelley wrote: I just tried all those domains using 2.76 and 8.8.8.8 upstream and all behaved correctly. 194.109.9.99 won't talk to me, so I can't

[Dnsmasq-discuss] No DHCP leases handed on bridge interface

2016-07-15 Thread Sébastien Delafond
Hello, I have a server with a bridge containing only one interface (ideally it'll of course include more interfaces, but I've tried to eliminate as many factors as possible): $ brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br.eth0-2