[Dnsmasq-discuss] Using multiple upstream servers but sometimes the reply from the server which answers first is null.

2017-01-23 Thread Hongyi Zhao
Hi all, I use ``--all-servers'' combined with ``--servers-file='' to let dnsmasq query multiple upstream servers for me. But I find the following issue sometimes will happen: When I do the dns query, say, for the domain-name, softwareupdate.vmware.com, sometimes I will get correct result,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Got bad packet: bad compression pointer

2017-01-23 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 OK, that's a bit difficult to correlate the client and upstream, but I can see in the responses coming back from upstream that the order of the RRs in the Auth section of the "no-such name" replies is NSEC RRSIG (for NSEC) SOA RRSIG (for SOA)

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] tftp: provide dbus signal for downloaded files

2017-01-23 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Yes. Seems sensible. Can I make a request that the patch includes updates to the documentation: at least dbus/DBus-interface, and also the man page if that's appropriate. Cheers, Simon. On 20/01/17 14:29, Yegor Yefremov wrote: > I have an

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About UEFI PXE booting in proxy mode

2017-01-23 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks for the reply. Please could you repeat the tcpdump using the command tcpdump -s 0 -w capturefile and send me the resulting file? That has far more information than tcpdump prints. Cheers, Simon. On 20/01/17 08:39, Steven Shiau wrote: >

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Bluetooth networking issue

2017-01-23 Thread Aaron Brice
I am testing a bluetooth networking (bnep0) device on an Ubuntu 16.04 laptop. Everything works fine if I comment out dns=dnsmasq from the NetworkManager.conf. With dnsmasq on, everything works fine the first time I connect my bluetooth network device. When I disconnect it and reconnect it,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Making dnsmasq make OFFER faster than virtualbox NAT DHCP

2017-01-23 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 23/01/17 17:45, wkitt...@gmail.com wrote: > On 01/23/2017 06:49 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: >> Actually, it's permitted to have more than once DHCP server, but >> the client is entitled to wait for some time to hear from them >> all, and then pick

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Making dnsmasq make OFFER faster than virtualbox NAT DHCP

2017-01-23 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:45:28PM -0500, wkitt...@gmail.com wrote: > On 01/23/2017 06:49 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: > > Actually, it's permitted to have more than once DHCP server, but the client > > is entitled to wait for some time to hear from them all, and then pick > > whichever one it prefers,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Making dnsmasq make OFFER faster than virtualbox NAT DHCP

2017-01-23 Thread wkitty42
On 01/23/2017 06:49 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: Actually, it's permitted to have more than once DHCP server, but the client is entitled to wait for some time to hear from them all, and then pick whichever one it prefers, that's interesting... i can't say that i've ever heard that before... maybe

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq always answer dhcp NAK

2017-01-23 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 If I've understood the problem correctly, dnsmasq is never even seeing these packets. If the destination address in the IP-level header is for a random IP address then the kernel network stack will discard the packet, even if the link-layer MAC

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] will there be a 2.77 release anytime soon?

2017-01-23 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 T'would probably be a good idea, just for accumulated bug-fixes. Would be nice to nail the DNSSEC compression pointers bug first though. Cheers, Simon. On 22/01/17 16:41, Dave Taht wrote: > just checkin > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Making dnsmasq make OFFER faster than virtualbox NAT DHCP

2017-01-23 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Actually, it's permitted to have more than once DHCP server, but the client is entitled to wait for some time to hear from them all, and then pick whichever one it prefers, so trying to implement server priority by speed-of-reply is doomed to

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Is there a way to disable file/directory polling for specific addn-hosts files or conf-dir changes?

2017-01-23 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dnsmasq won't re-read /etc/hosts or files in a directory specified by - --addn-hosts automatically. It _will_ re-read files in a directory specified by --hostsdir. Armed with that information, the first thing to do might be to look at exactly what

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Bug forward upstream SERVFAIL

2017-01-23 Thread Martin Wetterwald
Hi, I agree with khm that it's not because A software does something that it's right and that B should also do it. I do think however like Dave (independently of what BIND does) that the aim of having several upstreams is to provide robustness. The upstreams in our case are the customer's ISP DNS