Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Support --server syntax in resolv-file

2017-04-07 Thread Kristian Evensen
Hi Simon, On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 at 00:21, Simon Kelley wrote: > I understand the desire to be able to specify resolvers dynamically with > the full set of source-address and routing options; that's actually > already available, and has been for a long time, using the DBus

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] bug: trunk DHCP offer/replies being ignored by some devices

2017-04-07 Thread Pedro MG Palmeiro
The latest firmware for the printer is from 2015. This is one of those shared Epson/Fuji/Xerox models which I believe is entering EOL, since there is already another printer called M200 (Ecotank). Anyway, I'll report it. Should the the implementation be correct in dnsmasq, then there will be more

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Blacklist selection per dhcp-host?

2017-04-07 Thread Art Greenberg
I am currently using addn-hosts for DNS blacklisting. All of the dhcp client machines on my network use static assignment via dhcp-host entries in the config file. Running dnsmasq version 2.48 on Centos 6 (yes, I'm aware its old but that seems to be the most recent version in the Centos 6

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] bug: trunk DHCP offer/replies being ignored by some devices

2017-04-07 Thread Simon Kelley
On 06/04/17 14:01, Pedro MG Palmeiro wrote: > Dnsmasq trunk replies are being ignored by some devices, in my case, two > epson printers (AL-M200). > Dnsmasq 2.76 works fine. > > This could be related with > http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit; >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH v2] Add --dhcp-reply-delay option to delay DHCP replies

2017-04-07 Thread Simon Kelley
On 30/03/17 12:38, Floris Bos wrote: > Adds option to delay replying to DHCP packets by one or more seconds. > This provides a workaround for a PXE boot firmware implementation > that has a bug causing it to fail if it receives a (proxy) DHCP > reply instantly. > > On Linux it looks up the exact

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Support --server syntax in resolv-file

2017-04-07 Thread Simon Kelley
The overriding objection to this is that it adds to the syntax and semantics of the resolv-file format, but dnsmasq doesn't "own" that format: it's actually a libc configuration file, and dnsmasq takes advantage of the fact that the format is "well known" to extract useful information from it. If