Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Authoritative and recursive service from the same interface

2018-09-28 Thread Eric Luehrsen
On 09/28/2018 06:46 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: On 28/09/18 23:07, Marc Heckmann wrote: Very nice, I will test this. I am curious though: what will be used for the NS record if the auth-server configuration is omitted? It appears to return an NS record of "." ie the DNS root. Which is not

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Authoritative and recursive service from the same interface

2018-09-28 Thread Simon Kelley
On 28/09/18 23:07, Marc Heckmann wrote: > Very nice, I will test this. > > I am curious though: what will be used for the NS record if the > auth-server configuration is omitted? It appears to return an NS record of "." ie the DNS root. Which is not particularly sensible. This may need some

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Authoritative and recursive service from the same interface

2018-09-28 Thread Marc Heckmann
Very nice, I will test this. I am curious though: what will be used for the NS record if the auth-server configuration is omitted? -m On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:42 PM Simon Kelley wrote: > On 28/09/18 02:33, Marc Heckmann wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm currently running dnsmasq in a Docker

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Authoritative and recursive service from the same interface

2018-09-28 Thread Simon Kelley
On 28/09/18 02:33, Marc Heckmann wrote: > Hello, > > I'm currently running dnsmasq in a Docker container and have setup a > domain for which dnsmasq is to be authoritative for. This is to do > subdomain delegation to the dnsmasq server. I am using the auth-server & > auth-zone configuration