Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Documented Redundancy?

2014-07-31 Thread Simon Kelley
On 30/07/14 07:35, Joel Krauska wrote: I've seen a few interesting proposals for running dnsmasq in a redundant way. (running active/passive and trying to keep leases updated atomically, eg. using a db) But I haven't seen an actual implementation documented anywhere. Those concepts

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Documented Redundancy?

2014-07-31 Thread Gui Iribarren
On 31/07/14 13:23, Simon Kelley wrote: On 30/07/14 07:35, Joel Krauska wrote: I've seen a few interesting proposals for running dnsmasq in a redundant way. (running active/passive and trying to keep leases updated atomically, eg. using a db) But I haven't seen an actual implementation

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Documented Redundancy?

2014-07-30 Thread Joel Krauska
I've seen a few interesting proposals for running dnsmasq in a redundant way. (running active/passive and trying to keep leases updated atomically, eg. using a db) But I haven't seen an actual implementation documented anywhere. Those concepts mostly 'address' setting up a standby dhcp server,