Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable? Deprecate old prefixes?

2013-07-27 Thread Simon Kelley
On 26/07/13 22:19, Uwe Schindler wrote: Hi, After some testing and reconnecting PPP connection several times: All works fine. It also recognizes multiple old prefixes and sends all of them as deprecated. Regarding the Android-Bug: I found out that I still have to enable the fast mode (which is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] PATCH: Address some FQDN issues

2013-07-27 Thread Simon Kelley
On 24/07/13 16:04, Roy Marples wrote: On 24/07/2013 14:29, Simon Kelley wrote: I think this should happen already: for IPv4 calls to do_options have the domain argument which is set to the result of get_domain(address) which will be domain-suffix unless there's a more specific example. This

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable? Deprecate old prefixes?

2013-07-27 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, I send in my config: dhcp-option=option6:information-refresh-time,1h Otherwise, Windows Clients never try to renew information from DHCPv6 (it looks like that to me, in reality its 86400 secs, which is the default if not specified). http://www.6net.org/publications/standards/rfc4242.txt

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable? Deprecate old prefixes?

2013-07-27 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, Regarding the Android-Bug: I found out that I still have to enable the fast mode (which is only done in the first minute after a config change). The reason is: Although the prefix has a lifetime of 86400 on my dhcp-range, in contrast, the router itself gets a lifetime of 1800

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable? Deprecate old prefixes?

2013-07-27 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, I found the reason for this bug: One small thing with your new code - maybe a bug, because the comment says something else: Although the configured (in my config) valid_lifetime of the prefix is now lower (30 mins on my machine), after deprecation it raises the valid_lifetime again up

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable? Deprecate old prefixes?

2013-07-27 Thread Simon Kelley
On 27/07/13 19:11, Uwe Schindler wrote: In my opinion, dnsmasq should by default (like for stateful IPv4 leases) use the lifetime specified in the dhcp-range to request the clients to refresh this information. If it is explicitely given, of course use the information from

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Decouple enable-tftp and no-dhcp-interface

2013-07-27 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
On Jul 25, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: On Jul 25, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: On 23/06/13 20:34, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: Hi, I'd like to suggest that enable-tftp and no-dhcp-interface should be decoupled. Not only is it confusing that no-dhcp-interface also