Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] gatway

2013-10-10 Thread Simon Kelley
On 08/10/13 12:09, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: From: Simon Kelley Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 4:20 PM On 06/10/13 11:32, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: Hi, RFC4861 says: A router might want to send Router Advertisements without advertising itself as a default router. For instance,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [Cerowrt-devel] Names not resolved on Wireless

2013-10-10 Thread Dave Taht
Dear Dr. Dnsmasq: When cerowrt made the jump between dnsmasq-2.67-test10 and dnsmasq-2.67-test17, detection of interfaces other than the first started failing. It seems to be related to interfaces that come up after dnsmasq starts, as restarting it after the device is fully booted works. Have

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp relay

2013-10-10 Thread Michael Rack
Hi Simon, is dhcp-helper able to set Opt 5 / 11 * DHCP-Server-Identifier-Override * Subnet-Link-Selection and is dhcp-helper bind to interface or port? And is dhcp-helper also able to forward DHCPv6 Requests? Liebe Grüße aus Freilassing, Michael Rack RSM Freilassing -- RSM Freilassing

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [Cerowrt-devel] Names not resolved on Wireless

2013-10-10 Thread Simon Kelley
Does reverting http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=397542b213ab4071734f1cdf4cc914d87100456f fix the issue? I fear it might. Cheers, Simon. On 10/10/13 15:43, Dave Taht wrote: Dear Dr. Dnsmasq: When cerowrt made the jump between dnsmasq-2.67-test10 and

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp relay

2013-10-10 Thread Simon Kelley
On 10/10/13 15:48, Michael Rack wrote: Hi Simon, is dhcp-helper able to set Opt 5 / 11 * DHCP-Server-Identifier-Override * Subnet-Link-Selection No. and is dhcp-helper bind to interface or port? Interface, yes, port, no. And is dhcp-helper also able to forward DHCPv6 Requests? No,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [Cerowrt-devel] Names not resolved on Wireless

2013-10-10 Thread Dave Taht
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote: Does reverting http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=397542b213ab4071734f1cdf4cc914d87100456f fix the issue? I fear it might. Seems likely. I reverted that patch and put it in this build

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [Cerowrt-devel] Names not resolved on Wireless

2013-10-10 Thread Simon Kelley
I'm not sure that's the problem, but it's worth a try. Another thing to do is add a a line to log if bindtodevice() in src/dhcp-common.c actually sets the SO_BINDTODEVICE sockopt. It's not supposed to even is there's currently exactly one interface, if there's a possibility that more will

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] gatway

2013-10-10 Thread Simon Kelley
On 08/10/13 12:09, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: From: Simon Kelley Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 4:20 PM On 06/10/13 11:32, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: Hi, RFC4861 says: A router might want to send Router Advertisements without advertising itself as a default router. For instance,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [Cerowrt-devel] Names not resolved on Wireless

2013-10-10 Thread Simon Kelley
Having thought about this more, this patch is necessary http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=8584c502d37627d8abe18213771b5f4f98cb4aa3 and should fix the bug iff 1) Dnsmasq is configured using --except-interface=upstream interface and there are no --interface=interface we

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [Cerowrt-devel] Names not resolved on Wireless

2013-10-10 Thread Dave Taht
3.10.15-4 is now out there, containing sufficient patches to get dnsmasq to the current head of tree, and including the patch below. http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.15-4/ On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote: Having thought about