Hello,
I wondering what would be the effort, and if there'd
actually be any interest for some dnsmasq cache improvements.
Two things
i'd love to see:
- Cache size in memory instead of lines
I'd rather
set 1GB than 1 lines, could 1 max be at least increased?
-
Granular purging of
Hello,
I was wondering what would be the effort, and if there'd
actually be any interest for some dnsmasq statistics improvements. (Yes
i'm splitting dicussions ^^)
For monitoring/graph purposes, actual
dnsmasq stats are a bit difficult to use and completely unusable if
using log_queries as it
On 2014-03-24 12:25, Olivier Mauras wrote:
I'd love to see a stats interface that would output total_queries,
cache_hits, cache_misses, memory used by cache, etc
What's wrong with: kill -SIGUSR1 `pidof dnsmasq`
Olaf
___
Dnsmasq-discuss
Mainly that it's barely usable with log_queries as greping log
files of 4 to 6GB tends to not be that responsive...
On 2014-03-24
13:33, Olaf Westrik wrote:
On 2014-03-24 12:25, Olivier Mauras
wrote:
I'd love to see a stats interface that would output
total_queries, cache_hits,
Hi.
I did a version diff scan between 2.68 and 2.69rc1 version.
From my point of view there is one thing worth of fixing,
I'm attaching the patch.
I'm also attaching the coverity scan log.
Regards,
Tomas Hozza
csdiff_dnsmasq_2.68-2.69rc1.err
Description: Binary data
From
openbsd 5.4: pkg_add libnettle (ew)
[make]
$ ./src/dnsmasq --version
Dnsmasq version 2.69rc1 Copyright (c) 2000-2014 Simon Kelley
Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP
DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack no-ipset auth DNSSEC
Would you please explain why the
Hi everybody,
I'd like to know if it is possible to configure dnsmasq to execute a
script after a name resolution request.
The ideia is having a script that updates a firewall each time
someone asks for the resolution of www.somedomain.com.
Any help would be appreciated.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:45 AM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com
wrote:
openbsd 5.4: pkg_add libnettle (ew)
[make]
$ ./src/dnsmasq --version
Dnsmasq version 2.69rc1 Copyright (c) 2000-2014 Simon Kelley
On 24/03/14 17:45, sven falempin wrote:
openbsd 5.4: pkg_add libnettle (ew)
[make]
$ ./src/dnsmasq --version
Dnsmasq version 2.69rc1 Copyright (c) 2000-2014 Simon Kelley
Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP
DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack no-ipset auth
Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk writes:
Note that you may want to add --dnssec-check-unsigned to the
configuration. That will cause dnsmasq to ensure that unsigned replies
are legit by ensuring that there exists secure denial of existence of
a DS record somewhere on the path from the DNS
On 24/03/14 17:44, John Newlin wrote:
Is it required to set a global ipv6 address on the interface that dnsmasq
is serving in order for ipv6 information requests to work?
It is.
Currently this system works by requesting a DP and IA from the upstream
dhcpv6 server, setting the WAN port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/03/14 11:07, Olivier Mauras wrote:
Hello,
I wondering what would be the effort, and if there'd actually be
any interest for some dnsmasq cache improvements. Two things i'd
love to see:
- Cache size in memory instead of lines I'd
I would certainly like to have a standard way of getting these
statistics, through the dns, perhaps one unified with whatever bind
and unbound use (or don't use.)
Not a lot of people seem to be aware of why dns caching forwarders are
so great, although benchmarks like namebench against your
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 21:55 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 24/03/14 11:25, Olivier Mauras wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering what would be the effort, and if there'd
actually be any interest for some dnsmasq statistics improvements. (Yes
i'm splitting dicussions ^^)
For
It would be very interesting to see the differences between dnsmasq
without DNSSEC, with DNSSEC and with DNSSEC and --dnssec-check-unsigned
Cheers,
Simon.
On 24/03/14 22:50, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I would certainly like to have
15 matches
Mail list logo
