Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq's AdvRouterAddr On equivalent

2014-04-17 Thread Simon Kelley
On 15/04/14 23:31, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Hey All, I had a bit of trouble getting ra to work on OpenBSD but manually compiling 2.69 seems to have done the trick. (Yay!) I was porting over my old radvd.conf from linux and I have this option set AdvRouterAddr On. I cannot seem to find the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Segfault in DNSSEC code

2014-04-17 Thread Simon Kelley
On 17/04/14 05:13, Wang Jian wrote: Will this conflict with ipset fix (which related to DNSSEC) days ago? No, both should be applied. Cheers, Simon. 2014-04-17 5:24 GMT+08:00 Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk: On 15/04/14 22:39, Manish Singh wrote: I've run across a segfault in the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq's AdvRouterAddr On equivalent

2014-04-17 Thread Brian Haley
On 04/17/2014 09:20 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: On 15/04/14 23:31, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Hey All, I had a bit of trouble getting ra to work on OpenBSD but manually compiling 2.69 seems to have done the trick. (Yay!) I was porting over my old radvd.conf from linux and I have this option set

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Stable releases v. development releases.

2014-04-17 Thread Simon Kelley
Thus far, dnsmasq has not maintained separate stable and development branches. One reason for this is that there's been a pretty strong policy of backwards-compatibility, so the penalty for upgrading to the latest release is low: we've almost certainly not broken your config, or changed behaviour.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq's AdvRouterAddr On equivalent

2014-04-17 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
- Original Message - From: Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 3:20:20 PM Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq's AdvRouterAddr On equivalent On 15/04/14 23:31, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Hey All, I had