Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problems with dnsmasq + authentication with AD

2015-03-25 Thread Erling Ringen Elvsrud
Thanks for your reply, I have tested further and it certainly looks like dnsmasq does not handle multiple A records with the same name like domaindnszones.mydomain.foo (resolves to 36 ip-adresses) and forestdnszones.mydomain.foo (resolves to 36 ip-adresses) that good We use dnsmasq 2.48 (RHEL

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problems with dnsmasq + authentication with AD

2015-03-25 Thread Olivier Mauras
Hello Erling, 2.48 is getting quite old, and i remember having encountered issues when first deploying the EL6 version. I've moved to newer versions long time ago and use dnsmasq in production in front of AD servers. I definitely can't reproduce that behaviour on 2.70, see below: # dig

[Dnsmasq-discuss] High Availability: Part Deux

2015-03-25 Thread Jonathan Fisher
Long time dnsmasq user here, It's a great product, and we're using it on a mid-sized network of 200+ hosts. Our business is to the point where we need to eliminate single points of failure to protect business continuity. I've looked through the archives and dnsmasq failure is a frequent topic of

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] No new lease for Option 82 requests until old one times out

2015-03-25 Thread Kincl, Jason C.
Hi, Sorry for bringing up such an old thread but I was circling back onto this problem and I wonder if we could revisit it. On 17/09/14 09:49, Joachim Nilsson wrote: Hi Simon, I've found a little problem with how Option 82 circuit-id/remote-id works. Everything is fine in the below setup