Hi,
that is good news that you considered implementing this, too.
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 19:31 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
I've considered it, and in an ideal world would like to implement it.
My experience is the _nothing_ to do with DNSSEC is not too
difficult and, to be honest, any system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've just released dnsmasq 2.74. This is a bugfix release which
addresses a few irritating and inconvenient regressions in 2.73, and
fixes a couple of DNSSEC corner-cases.
CHANGELOG below.
Cheers,
Simon.
version 2.74
Fix reversion
