Hi Folks,
Does dnsmasq support RFC4702 and option 81? Thanks.
-steven
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Hello,
back in October there was a discussion about enabling bogus-priv by
default [1].
Since I'm late to the party I can't reply directly to that thread, so
I'm creating a new one.
I want to add that there is a RFC recommendation out there regarding
this behavior, its RFC 6761 Sectio
Hi,
On 05.01.2016 21:55, Matthias Andree wrote:
That's not "without all patches".
Sorry, you're right of course...
But as far as I know, the ISC patch is needed for IPFire.
Best,
Matthias
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.the
Am 05.01.2016 um 21:01 schrieb Matthias Fischer:
> Hi,
>
> On 05.01.2016 20:11, Matthias Andree wrote:
>>> >Building always stops with the exact same errors, regardless if I use
>>> >'2.75' with a total of 41 patches by now, or the original
>>> >'2.75test4'-source.
>> Does either compile without t
Hi,
On 05.01.2016 20:11, Matthias Andree wrote:
>Building always stops with the exact same errors, regardless if I use
>'2.75' with a total of 41 patches by now, or the original
>'2.75test4'-source.
Does either compile without third-party patches?
Until now, it made no difference compiling "2
Am 05.01.2016 um 02:13 schrieb Matthias Fischer:
> Hi,
>
> sorry, this will be rather long...
>
> I'm trying to compile 'dnsmasq 2.75' (for use with 'IPFire 2.17 (i586) -
> core95') with
> all available patches but I'm always runnning into errors.
> Michael Tremer gave me the hint to ask here.
>
On Jan 5, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Matthias Fischer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05.01.2016 17:05, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> It seems you have disabled HAVE_DHCP with enabled HAVE_SCRIPT.
>>
>> Try disabling HAVE_SCRIPT in your build system...
>> --
>> -e 's|#define HAVE_SCRIPT|//#d
Hi,
On 05.01.2016 17:05, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
Hi Matthias,
It seems you have disabled HAVE_DHCP with enabled HAVE_SCRIPT.
Try disabling HAVE_SCRIPT in your build system...
--
-e 's|#define HAVE_SCRIPT|//#define HAVE_SCRIPT|g' \
--
Thanks, but sorry, it seems that this worked only p
On Jan 4, 2016, at 7:13 PM, Matthias Fischer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry, this will be rather long...
>
> I'm trying to compile 'dnsmasq 2.75' (for use with 'IPFire 2.17 (i586) -
> core95') with
> all available patches but I'm always runnning into errors.
...
> cd /usr/src/dnsmasq-2.76test4 && se
Hi list !
I don't know if it's expected or if it's a bug, but I have a strange
behavior when I rewrite TTL values : some RR type keep upstream SSL (at
least mx, txt and soa).
For example :
$ dig mx gmail.com
;; ANSWER SECTION:
gmail.com. 1689 IN MX 10 alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com.
gmail.com.
10 matches
Mail list logo