Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] using dnsmasq with 4 upstream servers

2016-09-02 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:23:44PM +0200, Daniel Steglich wrote: > I've got 4 upstream DNS Servers from my ISP (2 IPv4, 2 IPv6) and > use all of them in /etc/resolv.conf. I think you'd be better off to simplify this. Furthermore I am always leery of trusting ISP nameservers. Sooner or later th

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq does crash

2016-09-02 Thread e9hack
Am 31.08.2016 um 11:51 schrieb Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant: > > On 30/08/16 23:08, Simon Kelley wrote: >> Sorry about this. Putative fix pushed to git. > > Looks good. It doesn't go bang anymore on my system :-) The same for me. Regards, Hartmut ___ Dn

[Dnsmasq-discuss] using dnsmasq with 4 upstream servers

2016-09-02 Thread Daniel Steglich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I've got 4 upstream DNS Servers from my ISP (2 IPv4, 2 IPv6) and use all of them in /etc/resolv.conf. I start sending DNS SRV querys from a client to dnsmasq DNS relay every 5 seconds. Each request is sent to four DNS upstream servers (pri

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq doesn't reply to queries made over (link-local) IPv6

2016-09-02 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Simon Kelley writes: > My first thought is that it's probably replying to the wrong > interface: link local addresses can't be routed: you have to specify > the interface they're connected to. This insight came late to me, and > there's a chance that the dnsmasq code is still messing it up. I'll

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq doesn't reply to queries made over (link-local) IPv6

2016-09-02 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 My first thought is that it's probably replying to the wrong interface: link local addresses can't be routed: you have to specify the interface they're connected to. This insight came late to me, and there's a chance that the dnsmasq code is still me