Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq-discuss Digest, Vol 138, Issue 13

2016-11-21 Thread Rahul Jain
the source and ran it, the same thing doesn't happen. Thanks & Regards, Rahul Jain -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20161121/fb2c706e/attachment-0001.html> -

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 ULA & Global address allocation & Apple devices

2016-11-21 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
On 21/11/16 15:52, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: PS: As a total hack, I got dnsmasq to ignore any requested addresses. Dnsmasq replies with both ULA & Global addresses in the reply...and my iPad is happy...it takes the global address. Nope, the above worked temporarily by luck rather

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq-discuss search facility (s.O.T.)

2016-11-21 Thread Simon Kelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I'm almost completely sure I've never done anything to remove the advertising from the mail-archive pages. I'm absolutely that I've not paid for that. Cheers, Simon. On 17/11/16 16:18, Jim Alles wrote: > Simon, > > I very much like the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 ULA & Global address allocation & Apple devices

2016-11-21 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
I've got some packet captures now that have helped answer some of the questions. 1) The DHCPADVERTISE in the log are included in just one packet. 2) The solicits from my ipad and the advertises are identical except dnsmasq presents the ULA address first whereas odhcpd presents the global

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Help: Changes when service dnsmasq start is executed

2016-11-21 Thread /dev/rob0
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:43:24PM +, Rahul Jain wrote: > I want to know about all the changes(internally as in files etc) > when "service dnsmasq start" is executed. I noticed one change that This question should be directed to your distro. Whilst Simon might have some involvement with

[Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCPv6 ULA & Global address allocation & Apple devices

2016-11-21 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Hi All, This problem has been around a while (forever?) but it's only just annoyed me sufficiently to investigate. The box in question is running a recent version LEDE and in my case dnsmasq git head bleeding edge. LEDE normally uses its homegrown odhcpd to hand out DHCPv6 addresses,