Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [BUG] [PATCH] RA are sent too fast and slows down the machine

2019-08-30 Thread Simon Kelley
This is useful information, but what I don't understand, is where the flooding comes from. Sure, this confusion means that unsolicted ra will run every time there's a "new address" event, even if the new address isn't on the expected interface, but I can't see how it generates more "new address

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH v2] Change dhcp_release to use default address when no IP subnet matches

2019-08-30 Thread Simon Kelley
That looks fine. Patch applied. Cheers, Simon. On 28/08/2019 21:13, haleyb@gmail.com wrote: > From: Brian Haley > > Currently, dhcp_release will only send a 'fake' release > when the address given is in the same subnet as an IP > on the interface that was given. > > This doesn't work

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Insecure DS reply received, do upstream DNS servers support DNSSEC?

2019-08-30 Thread Tore Anderson
* Simon Kelley > I just pushed > > http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=fef2f1c75eba56b7355cbe729e4362474d558aa4 > > Which makes the following changes: > > 1) No longer fail to validate a reply proving that a DS record doesn't > exist if RRs in the auth section other the