Hey Simon,
we've observed that since
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=1627d577af03cdf747285e79fa747b6aaae8033f
dnsmasq wouldn't build any longer in our docker environment.
Even when your further commit
Hey (again) Simon and the other list members,
I received some private user's requests (mostly Pi-hole users,
apparently) which do seem to ultimately need arbitrary prefix-lengths
also for IPv6 addresses. As the majority of code now already existed for
IPv4, I changed my mind and added arbitrary
>
>
> Oops. The simple setup doesn't work.
> In case there are two UML VMs that "see each other" through
> the vHub, feel free to share that config with us.
It's difficult for me to share the config outright as I'm using a modified
version of netkit that I've updated to a much newer kernel -
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 06:03:13PM +0100, Josh H wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 16:56, wrote:
> >
> > what about nftables if you are using a recent version of linux? many seem
> > to be moving to nftables from iptables...
> > https://linuxhandbook.com/iptables-vs-nftables/
>
>
> Running the
>
>
> what about nftables if you are using a recent version of linux? many seem
> to be
> moving to nftables from iptables...
> https://linuxhandbook.com/iptables-vs-nftables/
Running the command "nft list ruleset" gives me no output, so I assume no
rules have been setup.
Apologies for the
>
> what about nftables if you are using a recent version of linux? many seem
> to be
> moving to nftables from iptables...
> https://linuxhandbook.com/iptables-vs-nftables/
Running the command "nft
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 16:56, wrote:
> On 4/15/20 7:18 AM, Josh H wrote:
> >
> > Working
On 4/15/20 7:18 AM, Josh H wrote:
Working on ISC but not dnsmasq reinforces my diagnosis: dhcpd bypasses
iptables for such packets, dnsmasq doesn't.
I have no rules on either of the machines with iptables:
what about nftables if you are using a recent version of linux? many seem to
>
>
> Tell more about the set up in use.
> My hope is that it provides some clue why `tcpdump` can see DHCP network
> traffic that `dnsmasq` should seen also.
I'm running a very odd environment in that I'm using 2 usermodelinux
virtual machines connected via a virtual hub. I've got such a
> Working on ISC but not dnsmasq reinforces my diagnosis: dhcpd bypasses
> iptables for such packets, dnsmasq doesn't.
I have no rules on either of the machines with iptables:
root@dns:~# iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain FORWARD
