That’s really up to the maintainer of the debian packages. I suspect they’ll
fix it at some point.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 1, 2021, at 20:16, mailinglistno...@abwesend.de wrote:
>
> Hello,
> will a Debian update for Buster still be released in the future?
>
Hello,
will a Debian update for Buster still be released in the future?
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/dnsmasq
Currently the status is vulnerable.
Best Regards
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Good spot. I've just posted version 3, which addresses this, and also
> includes the changes to the Makefile, stupidly omitted from v2.
Thank you Simon! This version compiled for me.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
On 01/02/2021 23:55, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
I just committed another tweak, to get eg v2.65test1 and v2.65test11 in
the correct order.
Maybe the missing description of 2.84 could be added to CHANGELOG and
the resulting commit, exceptionally, re-tagged as 2.84?
Wouldn't this also avoid
On 31/01/2021 11:21, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> Besides not pretty, it is also not readable.
> Plus '-k 1.6,1.6' looks very odd in that line.
>
> | sort -k1.2,1.5r -k1.6,1.7r -k1.8,1.9r -k1.10,1.11r
> looks more "having a pattern"
But it's wrong. The -k1.6,1.6 sorts on the first letter _after_
On 31/01/2021 19:27, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 31.01.21 um 12:21 schrieb Geert Stappers:
>> Lonnie Abelbeck's hint on another release was indeed very humble
>> and very polite. And yes, he is right with expressing
>> We do ourself and the rest of mankind a favour by avoiding
>> version
Good spot. I've just posted version 3, which addresses this, and also
includes the changes to the Makefile, stupidly omitted from v2.
https://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnspooq-patches/2.80-dnspooq.patch.v3
Cheers,
Simon.
On 01/02/2021 22:25, WU, CHRIS wrote:
>> The patch does address all
>The patch does address all seven CVEs. Note that there's a second version of
>the patch, at
>which 1) fixes a regression seen in 2.83 and 2) was created with the correct
>flags to patch, so the new file src/hash_questions.c is included.
>
>Cheers,
>Simon.
Hi Simon.
FYI, this newest patch
