Hey Carl,
On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both dynamic and
> static IPs.
Why use a static IP at all? We have often enough seen people use static
addresses for the wrong reasons.
Consider using only DHCP and
(a) use
Dear Nicolas Cavallari
I really appreciate your help
I will go to my rest code and do some correction
Well, actually that not freeradius (as a software name) but as a node name.
All thing come from freeradius is sourced from my rest code.
Sincerely
-bino-
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 6:26 PM
This is a bit OT, if there is a better place let me know.
I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both dynamic and
static IPs.
There is a risk that my static choice collides with an IP on a random lan I
jack into, which I can deal with manually. Might even make a MOTD message
When using multiple dnsmasq instances Ubus only connects on one of them.
Since 3c93e8eb41952a9c91699386132d6fe83050e9be dnsmasq crashes instead.
This change avoids the crash, leading to a graceful retry + error log.
Signed-off-by: Etan Kissling
---
src/dnsmasq.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 11:52:10AM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 4:12 AM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:30:18AM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> > > but how to know if dnsmasq is receiving that response?
> >
> > ... use networksniffer at **server** to
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 02:58:16PM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 1:24 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:55:01AM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> > > Dear All.
> >
> > > Is 'next-server' different from dhcp-option-66?
> >
> > Yes, they are two different
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 01:26:10PM +0200, Nicolas Cavallari wrote:
> Let's look at the reply from freeradius:
>
> > (14) Sent code 1026 Id 24307805 from 10.10.254.1:67 to 10.10.253.1:67
> > length 0
> > (14) DHCP-Relay-IP-Address = 10.10.253.1
> > (14) DHCP-Client-Identifier =
> On 16 Jun 2021, at 23:56, Etan Kissling wrote:
>
> This integrates the proposed Dnsmasq patch from email:
> - [PATCH v5] dnsmasq: connection track mark based DNS query filtering
> into OpenWrt 21.02.
>
> Signed-off-by: Etan Kissling
> (updated to latest patch)
> Signed-off-by: Etan
Let's look at the reply from freeradius:
(14) Sent code 1026 Id 24307805 from 10.10.254.1:67 to 10.10.253.1:67
length 0
(14) DHCP-Relay-IP-Address = 10.10.253.1
(14) DHCP-Client-Identifier = 0xff2784511b000100012867cc8108002784511b
(14) DHCP-IP-Address-Lease-Time = 7200
(14)
Dear Geert Stappers
I really appreciate your help
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 1:24 PM Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss <
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:55:01AM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> > Dear All.
>
> > Is 'next-server' different from
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:55:01AM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> Dear All.
Hello,
> I have 3 Virtualbox guest.
> A. tftp-server DNSMASQ v.2.80 with IP address 10.10.254.1
> B. dhcp-server DNSMASQ v.280 with IP address 10.10.254.2 and 10.10.253.1
> (This one facing IPXE client)
> C. IPXE client
11 matches
Mail list logo
