Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] what is 'next-server' ? is it dhcp-option 66?

2021-06-27 Thread Bino Oetomo
Dear Geert Stappers On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 4:31 PM Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss < dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > > > OK, it got implemented well. > > > with your helps > > > > -- > > > Silence is hard to parse > > > > > > > > Thankyou Geert Stappers, > > I really

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq dhcp relay not relaying response from upstream to client

2021-06-27 Thread Bino Oetomo
Dear All After I do what Nicolas Cavallari told me to do, It works smooth. Since my FreeRadius installation is sourcing all reply attribute from my rest service, I made my rest to: 1. Give the right broadcast address DHCP option. 2. Give the right Server Identifier DHCP option. Point #2 also

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host precedence

2021-06-27 Thread Simon Kelley
On 20/06/2021 20:58, Jesus M Diaz wrote: > Hello, > > Let me explain the scenario: > > - I have a number of computers acquiring IP-address by DHCP and I have > dnsmasq configured with static leases for specific mac-addresses. > - I also have a couple of virtual computers for very specific

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Do not crash when Ubus connection fails.

2021-06-27 Thread Etan Kissling
On 27.06.21, 22:56, "Simon Kelley" wrote: > I've committed 8a1ef367e27e570cac40d3b09920a4a60c5f7e0b which has the > same effect as your patch, but modifies the ubus code, and contains a > note that this needs to be looked at by someone who knows. It > more-or-less restores the status-quo

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Do not crash when Ubus connection fails.

2021-06-27 Thread Simon Kelley
On 27/06/2021 20:19, Etan Kissling wrote: > > > On 27.06.21, 19:48, "Simon Kelley" wrote: > >> My change made the ubus code work in the same way as DBus. It expects >> that ubus_init() will return a non-NULL error report if something >> unexpected and nasty happened. (maybe a configuration

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Do not crash when Ubus connection fails.

2021-06-27 Thread Etan Kissling
On 27.06.21, 19:48, "Simon Kelley" wrote: > My change made the ubus code work in the same way as DBus. It expects > that ubus_init() will return a non-NULL error report if something > unexpected and nasty happened. (maybe a configuration that can never > work.) If the Ubus connection cannot

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] OT client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread Carl Karsten
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:12 PM wrote: > On 6/27/21 1:01 PM, Carl Karsten wrote: > > If I do not have access to the venue network, then my networking needs > are just > > my 2 devices. This is the case I am trying to provide for, without > having to edit > > a config file. the Opsis PC is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] OT client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread wkitty42
On 6/27/21 1:01 PM, Carl Karsten wrote: If I do not have access to the venue network, then my networking needs are just my 2 devices.  This is the  case I am trying to provide for, without having to edit a config file.  the Opsis PC is often headless,  so editing is done via ssh from the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Do not crash when Ubus connection fails.

2021-06-27 Thread Simon Kelley
On 27/06/2021 00:22, Etan Kissling wrote: > When using multiple dnsmasq instances Ubus only connects on one of them. > Since 3c93e8eb41952a9c91699386132d6fe83050e9be dnsmasq crashes instead. > This change avoids the crash, leading to a graceful retry + error log. > > Signed-off-by: Etan Kissling

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] OT client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread Carl Karsten
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:49 AM Andrew Miskell wrote: > > > On Jun 27, 2021, at 09:30, Carl Karsten wrote: > >  > > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote: > >> On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Karsten wrote: >> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote: >> > >> >> On 6/27/2021

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:48:56AM -0500, Andrew Miskell via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On Jun 27, 2021, at 09:30, Carl Karsten wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote: > >> On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Karsten wrote: > >> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote: > >> >>

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] OT client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread Andrew Miskell via Dnsmasq-discuss
> On Jun 27, 2021, at 12:02, Carl Karsten wrote: > >  > > >> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:49 AM Andrew Miskell >> wrote: >> >> On Jun 27, 2021, at 09:30, Carl Karsten wrote: >>>  >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote: On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread Andrew Miskell via Dnsmasq-discuss
> On Jun 27, 2021, at 09:30, Carl Karsten wrote: > >  > > >> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote: >> On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Karsten wrote: >> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote: >> > >> >> On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote: >> >>> Hey Carl, >> >>> >> >>> On

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread john doe
On 6/27/2021 3:53 PM, Carl Karsten wrote: On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote: On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Karsten wrote: On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote: On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote: Hey Carl, On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: I'm

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Add EDE status "no matching key found"

2021-06-27 Thread Dominik DL6ER
Hey Simon, I tried your recent extended DNS errors (EDE) addition. I tested the following well-know DNSSEC testing domains: - dnssec-failed.org: "BOGUS (EDE: DNSKEY missing)" - rhybar.cz: "BOGUS (EDE: DNSSEC signature expired)" - sigfail.verteiltesysteme.net: "BOGUS" Interestingly,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] what is 'next-server' ? is it dhcp-option 66?

2021-06-27 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 03:06:14PM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 12:03 AM Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 02:58:16PM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 1:24 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:55:01AM +0700, Bino

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 02:17:20AM -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote: > > On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote: > > > On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: > > >> I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both dynamic and > > >>

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] what is 'next-server' ? is it dhcp-option 66?

2021-06-27 Thread Bino Oetomo
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 12:03 AM Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss < dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 02:58:16PM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 1:24 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:55:01AM +0700, Bino

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
> These machines are portable. [0] On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 01:26:24AM -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 12:03 AM Dominik wrote: > > > Hey Carl, > > > > On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: > > > I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread Carl Karsten
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote: > On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote: > > Hey Carl, > > > > On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: > >> I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both dynamic and > >> static IPs. > > > > Why use a static IP at all? We

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread john doe
On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote: Hey Carl, On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both dynamic and static IPs. Why use a static IP at all? We have often enough seen people use static addresses for the wrong reasons.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] client q: both static and dhcp

2021-06-27 Thread Carl Karsten
These machines are portable. they will likely start out on a lan where I control the dhcp server; the os apps and config are setup, then they are moved to another room. They live there for a few days to a week, and then are put back in storage, with a few being left out for R to experiment