Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Offered IPv4 DHCP address ping fix

2021-12-08 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 01:18:42AM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote: > Hi Simon and others, > > I am debugging strange issue, which happens inside OpenStack in certain > situations. It seems under not precisely defined conditions dnsmasq > returns "no address available" error even in situation, when not

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq on large scale network

2021-12-08 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 03:28:40AM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote: > On 12/5/21 19:44, Fabian Druschke wrote: > > Hey friends, i hope you all are doing fine. > > > > Currently i'm facing a little challenge. I have a large network with > > more or less 30k clients, and i need a router for NAT from the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] 2.80 dnspooq v3 problem

2021-12-08 Thread Petr Menšík
Hi, yes, there were some fixes related to bind to device option. I would suggest looking at CentOS 8/RHEL 8 patches of 2.79 [1], which hopefully fixed also regressions caused by the CVE fixes. Description of the problem matches something I had to fix later, it should be some of recent patches. I

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Offered IPv4 DHCP address ping fix

2021-12-08 Thread Petr Menšík
I am afraid there are some implementation problems found in IPv4 DHCP allocations. If multiple machines start at the same time (I have script to launch 16), especially with dhcp-sequential-ip it is problematic. ISC dhclient can cope with it somehow well, but some PXE booting firmware is less

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq on large scale network

2021-12-08 Thread Petr Menšík
Interesting, I am just debugging situation when multiple instances start and request DHCP at similar time. Without no-ping option, it works quite bad. Even starting 16 instances at the same time does not work reliably to us with ping enabled. It seems our 2.79 version is broken, 2.81 were fixed.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Fix segfault and regressions in option --rebind-domain-ok

2021-12-08 Thread Simon Kelley
On 18/11/2021 18:21, Sung Pae wrote: > Hello list, > > The --rebind-domain-ok option is broken in v2.86 and on master in the > following ways: > > * In v2.85, --stop-dns-rebind --rebind-domain-ok=test.me would only allow > "test.me" and subdomains of "test.me" to return private addresses to