Could dnsmasq be twerked to pay attention to mDNS?
N
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:29:54 +0200
Petr Menšík wrote:
> I thought about it very similar way. Yes, SLAAC clients even on trusted
> network have absolutely no good way to make their own name registered
> and recognized similar way as DHCP
I thought about it very similar way. Yes, SLAAC clients even on trusted
network have absolutely no good way to make their own name registered
and recognized similar way as DHCP clients have. Yes, it would first
have to start on client side to even try to attempt to register the name.
I would
Normal conf-file or conf-dir is not re-read upon receiving SIGHUP
signal. You would have to use special servers-file for that. If you
explicitly add your blacklist using
servers-file=/etc/dnsmasq.d/blacklist.conf, it should be able to read
that blacklist again. I am afraid there is no
Hi Morgan,
I am quite sure dnsmasq cannot be client to anything. Especially not
dynamic dns client. I would recommend unbound for medium sized networks,
dnsmasq is great for small networks. Depends.
dnsmasq can provide authoritative server parts as well as forwarder
caching. You have not
