On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 16:18 +0200, Harald Jensås wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We discovered an issue introduced in this commit:
> 137286e9baecf6a3ba97722ef1b49c851b531810
>
> Prior to this commit one could have two dhcp-host entries, one for
> IPv4
> and another for IPv6, for exampl
list for IPv6 still works:
dhcp-host=52:54:00:3f:5c:c0,[fd12:3456:789a:1::aa02],[fd12:3456:789a:1::aa04],[fd12:3456:789a:1::aa06],host1
My conclusion is that Petr's proposed patches are good.
> [1]
> https://opendev.org/openstack/neutron/src/branch/master/neutr
On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 16:18 +0200, Harald Jensås wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We discovered an issue introduced in this commit:
> 137286e9baecf6a3ba97722ef1b49c851b531810
>
> Prior to this commit one could have two dhcp-host entries, one for
> IPv4
> and another for IPv6, for exampl
Hi,
We discovered an issue introduced in this commit:
137286e9baecf6a3ba97722ef1b49c851b531810
Prior to this commit one could have two dhcp-host entries, one for IPv4
and another for IPv6, for example:
dhcp-host=52:54:00:bc:c3:fd,172.20.0.11,host2
On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 21:37 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 10/02/2020 17:56, Harald Jensås wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 21:27 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > > Two commits in the repo, one adds arbitrary list of IPv6
> > > addresses to
> > > dhcp-host, s
On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 21:27 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Two commits in the repo, one adds arbitrary list of IPv6 addresses to
> dhcp-host, second adds tags.
>
> Please give them a whirl
>
Thank you for working on this Simon. I have tested the following
configuration variations and there
On Tue, 2020-02-04 at 00:06 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> I went though this carefully, and decided that replacing the address
> in
> the dhcp-host with the next free one, but otherwise treating things
> the
> same might not work well. For instance, there are places where the
> question is asked
>From a2a022cd3adc6c0ad6007c63bba3fd4a2ff28165 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Harald=20Jens=C3=A5s?=
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:10:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] dhcp-host - tag filtering
Adds support for tag's on the dhcp-host config entries.
Find config will collect candidate
On Sun, 2020-01-26 at 20:01 +0100, Oliver Freyermuth wrote:
> I also like this new approach. "Wasting" 4 addresses for one host
> seems to be the only way
> to solve this while conforming to RFCs.
>
> However, there's one issue I can't find a good solution for in this
> scheme -
> how to solve
ny platforms
where dnsmasq run I opted to support a max prefix of /64. So a prefix
between /64 - /128 are valid in config. If the user tries to use a
prefix < /64 an error is raised.
Updated patch below:
From 0c3aeb799d185007d7c9feeb10c84a582b769a72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Jensås
On Tue, 2020-01-21 at 23:38 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Simon Kelley
>
> > I have an alternative suggestion for the syntax of dhcp-host.
> > It's less flexible, but simpler and easier to understand and to
> > explain,
> > and uses existing semantics rather than adding new keywords.
> >
> >
with ordering of entries in the configuration file.
--
Harald
From cfd8881d57ba9e0e26c183318f0118a5ca65c705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Jensås
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 19:44:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] DHCPv6 - List or Range reservation for single host
Add the possibility to provide either
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 21:25 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 08/01/2020 09:32, Harald Jensås wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 21:51 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > > On 23/12/2019 11:24, Harald Jensas wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The pat
On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 21:51 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 23/12/2019 11:24, Harald Jensas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The patch below is a slight alteration to a possible solution
> > discussed in
> > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2017q1/011289.html
> > .
> >
> > My
On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 10:51 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi Harald! What are differences between your patch and mine which
> adds
> support for it too (plus honor assignment based on MAC address)?
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2019q4/013545.html
>
My patch allow
ttps://review.opendev.org/72) solved the
> long standing issue when doing network booting and node provisioning
> in combination with static only dhcp configuration.
>
> We are looking forward to comments and feedback regarding this
> approach.
>
> Thank you!
>
>
On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 10:35 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:12:00PM +0100, Harald Jensås wrote:
> > Bumping this patch again:
> > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q4/012707.html
> >
> > I see there have been
Bumping this patch again:
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q4/012707.html
I see there have been several request to include this on the list:
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2019q1/012895.html
(and others ...) afaict there has not been any
When using DHCP-stateful addressing, radvd config below, UEFI
succesfully request/advertize 2x IP's and downloads the bootimage
(iPXE). UEFI (OVMF) then releases the addresses and iPXE then boots.
iPXE does one request/advertize and dowloads and boot the deploy
ramdisk (CentoOS 7). dhclient in
On Mon, 2019-09-30 at 11:29 +0200, Harald Jensås wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get a setup with relays for DHCPv6 working, I can see
> the requests coming in and dnsmasq on the relay node forwards the
> request. On the server side I can see the dhcp6 relay-fwd coming in
>
-class) (opt_61) (opt_62) (user-
class) (elapsed-time 0))))
Regards
Harald Jensås
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
21 matches
Mail list logo
