On 9/13/23 13:18, TRUNKLES via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
I'd like to start by just asking a simple question I've not managed to
find an answer to anywhere else: are /etc/ethers and /etc/hosts
supposed to supersede dynamic IP allocaiton? Suppose I have all of my
"known" devices (MAC addresses)
On 12/18/22 09:10, Jonathan Stafford wrote:
Thanks, Michael. That will work to get them using that server, but
it's totally bypassing dnsmasq which means my local entries from
/etc/hosts don't resolve. I'd like both things to work to be difficult :)
Hi Jonathan,
Sorry, I didn't respond
, Jonathan Stafford wrote:Thanks, Michael. That will work to get them using that server, but it's totally bypassing dnsmasq which means my local entries from /etc/hosts don't resolve. I'd like both things to work to be difficult :)On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 10:36 AM Michael Smith <mich...@kmaclub.
On 12/18/22 06:59, Jonathan Stafford wrote:
--server provides a way to change upstream resolvers based on the
domain being queried. Is there a way to make the same sort of change
based on the client doing the querying? For example, I'd like the IP
address range I use for my kids' devices to
On 5/19/22 07:46, Maulis Adam via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Hello,
I like to configure my dhcp server with as little redundacy as
possible. But it looks like the IP address needs to be written both of
/etc/hosts and /etc/dnsmasq.conf
The client machines are in the /etc/hosts for example:
On 4/28/22 09:20, Will Dennis wrote:
Hi all,
I currently have dnsmasq set up and working well for the LAN that the
dnsmasq server is on (for our purposes, say 192.168.0.0/24.) Config is
like this currently:
Now, I have now set up a router (layer-3 switch) that has interfaces
to multiple
