On 14/05/16 19:55, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>>> Well, that's the smoking gun. Dnsmasq is doing the right thing, and your
>>> upstream server at 212.202.215.1 is broken. I realise that doesn't solve
>>> the problem, but at least you know where to work now :)
>>>
>>>
>>> (the reason
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 08:55:58PM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > > Well, that's the smoking gun. Dnsmasq is doing the right thing,
> > > and your upstream server at 212.202.215.1 is broken. I realise
> > > that doesn't solve the problem, but at least you know where to
> > > work now :)
> > >
Hi Simon,
> > Well, that's the smoking gun. Dnsmasq is doing the right thing, and your
> > upstream server at 212.202.215.1 is broken. I realise that doesn't solve
> > the problem, but at least you know where to work now :)
> >
> >
> > (the reason dnsmasq is returning SERVFAIL is that there's a
>
Hi Simon,
> Well, that's the smoking gun. Dnsmasq is doing the right thing, and your
> upstream server at 212.202.215.1 is broken. I realise that doesn't solve
> the problem, but at least you know where to work now :)
>
>
> (the reason dnsmasq is returning SERVFAIL is that there's a
>
