Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] FreeBSD vs. "bind-interfaces" and "except-interface"

2011-02-17 Thread Simon Kelley
Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 16.02.2011 17:41, schrieb Simon Kelley: > >>> in that case, dnsmasq binds to 192.168.0.4 according to lsof. >>> >>> >>> Is this a known issue on FreeBSD? What means are there to resolve this >>> so that users don't fall into this trap? >>> >> The behavior is the same

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] FreeBSD vs. "bind-interfaces" and "except-interface"

2011-02-16 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 16.02.2011 17:41, schrieb Simon Kelley: >> in that case, dnsmasq binds to 192.168.0.4 according to lsof. >> >> >> Is this a known issue on FreeBSD? What means are there to resolve this >> so that users don't fall into this trap? >> > > The behavior is the same on all platforms. > > Without

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] FreeBSD vs. "bind-interfaces" and "except-interface"

2011-02-16 Thread Simon Kelley
Matthias Andree wrote: > Situation: > > dnsmasq 2.56 supposed to answer all but loopback. named (system default > BIND 9.6.3, FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64) is bound to 127.0.0.1 and ::1 > port 53, confirmed with lsof. dnsmasq config is as follows: > > domain-needed > bogus-priv > no-resolv >

[Dnsmasq-discuss] FreeBSD vs. "bind-interfaces" and "except-interface"

2011-02-16 Thread Matthias Andree
Situation: dnsmasq 2.56 supposed to answer all but loopback. named (system default BIND 9.6.3, FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64) is bound to 127.0.0.1 and ::1 port 53, confirmed with lsof. dnsmasq config is as follows: domain-needed bogus-priv no-resolv no-poll server=127.0.0.1 except-interface