On 27/07/13 19:11, Uwe Schindler wrote:
I want to try and avoid making every parameter changable, like Radv
does. Who can tell what the parameters should be. A flag which says
stay in fast retransmit mode to fix buggy android seems much more
sensible.
That is perfectly fine! So a boolean
, July 29, 2013 4:55 PM
To: Uwe Schindler
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable?
Deprecate old prefixes?
On 27/07/13 19:21, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
I found the reason for this bug:
One small thing with your new
Hi Simon,
I want to try and avoid making every parameter changable, like Radv
does. Who can tell what the parameters should be. A flag which says
stay in fast retransmit mode to fix buggy android seems much more
sensible.
That is perfectly fine! So a boolean option to work around the
On 26/07/13 22:19, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
After some testing and reconnecting PPP connection several times: All
works fine. It also recognizes multiple old prefixes and sends all of
them as deprecated.
Regarding the Android-Bug: I found out that I still have to enable
the fast mode (which is
: Saturday, July 27, 2013 3:04 PM
To: Uwe Schindler
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable?
Deprecate old prefixes?
On 26/07/13 17:50, Uwe Schindler wrote:
One thing I found in my investigations: The lifetime given
Hi,
Regarding the Android-Bug: I found out that I still have to enable
the fast mode (which is only done in the first minute after a
config change). The reason is: Although the prefix has a lifetime of
86400 on my dhcp-range, in contrast, the router itself gets a
lifetime of 1800
Hi,
I found the reason for this bug:
One small thing with your new code - maybe a bug, because the comment
says something else: Although the configured (in my config) valid_lifetime of
the prefix is now lower
(30 mins on my machine), after deprecation it raises the valid_lifetime again
up
On 27/07/13 19:11, Uwe Schindler wrote:
In my opinion, dnsmasq should by default (like for stateful IPv4
leases) use the lifetime specified in the dhcp-range to request the
clients to refresh this information. If it is explicitely given, of
course use the information from
On 25/07/13 22:32, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
reading https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6204/?include_text=1, the
requirements for home routers are listed here:
L-13: If the delegated prefix changes, i.e., the current prefix is
replaced with a new prefix without any overlapping time period,
On 25/07/13 22:32, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
reading https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6204/?include_text=1, the
requirements for home routers are listed here:
L-13: If the delegated prefix changes, i.e., the current prefix is
replaced with a new prefix without any overlapping time period,
@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable?
Deprecate old prefixes?
On 25/07/13 22:32, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
reading https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6204/?include_text=1, the
requirements for home routers are listed here:
L-13: If the delegated prefix
-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Simon Kelley [mailto:si...@thekelleys.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 5:45 PM
To: Uwe Schindler
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable?
Deprecate old prefixes?
On 26/07
6:50 PM
To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable?
Deprecate old prefixes?
Have fun in Berlin! But the new code makes it possible to me to set the
lifetime of the dhcp-lease to good old pre-IPv6 times (86400s) so it is
very
On 24/07/13 19:16, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
RA's are not the same as DHCP, there's no such thing as a lease
time. What there is, is preferred and valid lifetimes. What should
happen is that when old address is about to go away, the address
for that prefix on the network adaptor
: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:17 PM
To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable?
Deprecate old prefixes?
Hi,
RA's are not the same as DHCP, there's no such thing as a lease time.
What there is, is preferred and valid lifetimes
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:17 PM To:
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk Subject: Re:
[Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable? Deprecate old
prefixes?
Hi,
RA's are not the same as DHCP, there's no such thing as a lease
time. What there is, is preferred and valid lifetimes. What
On 25/07/13 12:36, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi again,
one addition, because its too hot here... The reality is again
different (very complicated with IPv6):
Hot there too? Reply at the end.
On 24/07/13 19:16, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
RA's are not the same as DHCP, there's no such thing as
Hi,
On 24/07/13 19:16, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
RA's are not the same as DHCP, there's no such thing as a lease
time. What there is, is preferred and valid lifetimes. What
should happen is that when old address is about to go away, the
address for that prefix on the network adaptor
Hi,
On 25/07/13 11:59, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi again,
In addition, I found a relic from the time when the RA_INTERVAL value
was hardcoded into radv.c. There is still one:
Line 294: put_opt6_long(1800); /* lifetime - twice RA retransmit */
Should be: put_opt6_long(RA_INTERVAL *
Hi,
reading https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6204/?include_text=1, the
requirements for home routers are listed here:
L-13: If the delegated prefix changes, i.e., the current prefix is
replaced with a new prefix without any overlapping time
period, then the IPv6 CE
Hi,
RA's are not the same as DHCP, there's no such thing as a lease time.
What there is, is preferred and valid lifetimes. What should happen is
that when old address is about to go away, the address for that prefix
on the network adaptor should have its preferred lifetime set to zero,
Hi,
Le 16/07/2013 10:38, Uwe Schindler a écrit :
Hi,
I really like the dnsmasq implementation as replacement to my
previous installation with radvd, because it closely integrates with
DHCP. It also sends instant RA when a client requests DHCP, so it
does not have to wait until the RA is sent
: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make RA_INTERVAL configureable?
Deprecate old prefixes?
Hi,
But I found a problem, especially happening with mobile phones
(Android, Galaxy S3 in my case). When those go into sleep mode, they
no longer listen to router advertisements, so after waking up
23 matches
Mail list logo
