On 20/03/2020 02:18, Roy Marples wrote:
> On 19/03/2020 22:01, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=0506a5ed4e56863627c54aedad30ad61221292ef
>>
>>
>>
>> should handle both old kernel header files and old kernels, in any
>> combination.
>
> I really
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 02:18:18AM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> On 19/03/2020 22:01, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=0506a5ed4e56863627c54aedad30ad61221292ef
> >
> >
> > should handle both old kernel header files and old kernels, in any
> >
On 19/03/2020 22:01, Simon Kelley wrote:
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=0506a5ed4e56863627c54aedad30ad61221292ef
should handle both old kernel header files and old kernels, in any
combination.
I really dislike this approach because it makes the assumption that no
On 19/03/2020 21:01, Petr Gotthard wrote:
>> Thanks.
>>
>> FWIW in case it gets too silent
>> resend the patch as `git format-patch` artifact
>
> Oops, sorry. Let me resend it right away.
No need. I'm working on a slightly more elaborate alternative.
Simon.
>
>
>>From
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=0506a5ed4e56863627c54aedad30ad61221292ef
should handle both old kernel header files and old kernels, in any
combination.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 19/03/2020 13:16, Petr Gotthard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The commit
>
> Thanks.
>
> FWIW in case it gets too silent
> resend the patch as `git format-patch` artifact
Oops, sorry. Let me resend it right away.
>From f669af70871b80ab7ecf250ea56160a3378f2d94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Gotthard
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:47:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 01:16:11PM +, Petr Gotthard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The commit
> http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=1627d577af03cdf747285e79fa747b6aaae8033f
>
> introduced NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS, which is not available on some ancient
> platforms (which are
Hello,
The commit
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=1627d577af03cdf747285e79fa747b6aaae8033f
introduced NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS, which is not available on some ancient platforms
(which are however still in use).
The build of 2.81rc4 fails on these platforms now.
Would it