Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS not defined on old platforms

2020-03-28 Thread Simon Kelley
On 20/03/2020 02:18, Roy Marples wrote: > On 19/03/2020 22:01, Simon Kelley wrote: >> http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=0506a5ed4e56863627c54aedad30ad61221292ef >> >> >> >> should handle both old kernel header files and old kernels, in any >> combination. > > I really

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS not defined on old platforms

2020-03-20 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 02:18:18AM +, Roy Marples wrote: > On 19/03/2020 22:01, Simon Kelley wrote: > > http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=0506a5ed4e56863627c54aedad30ad61221292ef > > > > > > should handle both old kernel header files and old kernels, in any > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS not defined on old platforms

2020-03-19 Thread Roy Marples
On 19/03/2020 22:01, Simon Kelley wrote: http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=0506a5ed4e56863627c54aedad30ad61221292ef should handle both old kernel header files and old kernels, in any combination. I really dislike this approach because it makes the assumption that no

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS not defined on old platforms

2020-03-19 Thread Simon Kelley
On 19/03/2020 21:01, Petr Gotthard wrote: >> Thanks. >> >> FWIW in case it gets too silent >> resend the patch as `git format-patch` artifact > > Oops, sorry. Let me resend it right away. No need. I'm working on a slightly more elaborate alternative. Simon. > > >>From

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS not defined on old platforms

2020-03-19 Thread Simon Kelley
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=0506a5ed4e56863627c54aedad30ad61221292ef should handle both old kernel header files and old kernels, in any combination. Cheers, Simon. On 19/03/2020 13:16, Petr Gotthard wrote: > Hello, > > The commit >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS not defined on old platforms

2020-03-19 Thread Petr Gotthard
> Thanks. > > FWIW in case it gets too silent > resend the patch as `git format-patch` artifact Oops, sorry. Let me resend it right away. >From f669af70871b80ab7ecf250ea56160a3378f2d94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Gotthard Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:47:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS not defined on old platforms

2020-03-19 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 01:16:11PM +, Petr Gotthard wrote: > Hello, > > The commit > http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=1627d577af03cdf747285e79fa747b6aaae8033f > > introduced NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS, which is not available on some ancient > platforms (which are

[Dnsmasq-discuss] NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS not defined on old platforms

2020-03-19 Thread Petr Gotthard
Hello, The commit http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=1627d577af03cdf747285e79fa747b6aaae8033f introduced NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS, which is not available on some ancient platforms (which are however still in use). The build of 2.81rc4 fails on these platforms now. Would it