On 12/01/2012 10:08 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 01/12/12 14:54, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 05:23 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 21:03, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 12:45 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 17:20, Gene Czarc
On 01/12/12 14:54, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 05:23 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 21:03, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 12:45 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 17:20, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 11:32 AM, Simon K
On 11/30/2012 05:23 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 21:03, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 12:45 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 17:20, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 11:32 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 15:54, Gene Czarc
On 11/30/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 21:03, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 12:45 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 17:20, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 11:32 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 15:54, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/29/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kell
On 30/11/12 21:03, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 12:45 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 17:20, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 11:32 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 15:54, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/29/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 29/11/12 20:31, Gene Czarcinski
On 11/30/2012 12:45 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 17:20, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 11:32 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 15:54, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/29/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 29/11/12 20:31, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I spoke too quickly.
The cause o
On 30/11/12 17:20, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/30/2012 11:32 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 15:54, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/29/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 29/11/12 20:31, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I spoke too quickly.
The cause of the problem is libvirt related but I am not
On 11/30/2012 11:32 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/11/12 15:54, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/29/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 29/11/12 20:31, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I spoke too quickly.
The cause of the problem is libvirt related but I am not sure what just
yet.
I was running a libvi
On 30/11/12 15:54, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> On 29/11/12 20:31, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>>
>>> I spoke too quickly.
>>>
>>> The cause of the problem is libvirt related but I am not sure what just
>>> yet.
>>>
>>> I was running a libvirt that had a lot of
On 11/29/2012 04:18 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 29/11/12 20:31, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I spoke too quickly.
The cause of the problem is libvirt related but I am not sure what just
yet.
I was running a libvirt that had a lot of "stuff" on it but seemed to
work OK. Then, earlier today I update t
On 29/11/12 20:31, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I spoke too quickly.
The cause of the problem is libvirt related but I am not sure what just
yet.
I was running a libvirt that had a lot of "stuff" on it but seemed to
work OK. Then, earlier today I update to a point that appears to be
somewhat beyond
On 11/29/2012 02:56 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/29/2012 02:08 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/29/2012 11:28 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 29/11/12 16:06, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Something is definitely not working correctly. I do not know if you
have a qemu/kvm setup so duplicating the con
On 11/29/2012 02:08 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/29/2012 11:28 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 29/11/12 16:06, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Something is definitely not working correctly. I do not know if you
have a qemu/kvm setup so duplicating the conditions that way will
not work.
Attached is a
On 11/29/2012 11:28 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 29/11/12 16:06, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Something is definitely not working correctly. I do not know if you
have a qemu/kvm setup so duplicating the conditions that way will not work.
Attached is a piece of syslog (before I patched things to suppr
On 29/11/12 16:06, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> Something is definitely not working correctly. I do not know if you
> have a qemu/kvm setup so duplicating the conditions that way will not work.
>
> Attached is a piece of syslog (before I patched things to suppress the
> messages). BTW, I also have
On 29/11/12 16:06, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> Attached is a piece of syslog (before I patched things to suppress the
> messages). BTW, I also have no idea why anything is being done with
> "p33p1" ... that is the real NIC on that system. I have also attached
> the dnsmasq conf file for that interf
On 11/28/2012 03:31 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 25/11/12 18:39, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/25/2012 01:10 PM, Vladislav Grishenko wrote:
Hi Gene,
Instead of deprecating/turning-off logging by facility, it would be
better
to have ability to tune loglevel for each sysbsystem.
Like following: wher
On 25/11/12 18:39, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/25/2012 01:10 PM, Vladislav Grishenko wrote:
Hi Gene,
Instead of deprecating/turning-off logging by facility, it would be
better
to have ability to tune loglevel for each sysbsystem.
Like following: where 0 means
log-level=dhcp,dhcpv6,6,dns,7,ra,-1
On 11/26/2012 04:18 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/26/2012 03:22 PM, John Brendler wrote:
Hi Gene,
Instead of deprecating/turning-off logging by facility, it would be
better to have ability to tune loglevel for each sysbsystem.
Like following: where 0 means
log-level=dhcp,dhcpv6,6,dns,7,ra
On 11/26/2012 03:22 PM, John Brendler wrote:
Hi Gene,
Instead of deprecating/turning-off logging by facility, it would be
better to have ability to tune loglevel for each sysbsystem.
Like following: where 0 means
log-level=dhcp,dhcpv6,6,dns,7,ra,-1
Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko
++
> Hi Gene,
> Instead of deprecating/turning-off logging by facility, it would be
> better to have ability to tune loglevel for each sysbsystem.
> Like following: where 0 means
> log-level=dhcp,dhcpv6,6,dns,7,ra,-1
>
> Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko
++
Recording or ignoring certain mess
inski
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 9:31 PM
To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RA support in dnsmasq
On 11/24/2012 11:20 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
OK, I am using both "ra-only" and "enable-ra" in a couple of libvirt
dnsmasq instances.
1.
nsmasq-discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk [mailto:dnsmasq-
> discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of Gene Czarcinski
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 9:31 PM
> To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RA support in dnsmasq
>
>
On 11/24/2012 11:20 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
OK, I am using both "ra-only" and "enable-ra" in a couple of libvirt
dnsmasq instances.
1. I am getting a lot of "clutter" in syslog. How about using
log-dhcp to also enable all of the "RTR-ADVERT" messages. There are a
lot of them but they re
OK, I am using both "ra-only" and "enable-ra" in a couple of libvirt
dnsmasq instances.
1. I am getting a lot of "clutter" in syslog. How about using log-dhcp
to also enable all of the "RTR-ADVERT" messages. There are a lot of
them but they really provide little if any useful information.
25 matches
Mail list logo
