Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue

2013-02-15 Thread Simon Kelley
On 13/02/13 22:17, C V wrote: Sent: Wed, February 13, 2013 12:19:51 PM Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue The only 1 time I have been able to reproduce by hand is by trying it on a long-running (many days) process in a cloud that was not being used actively. OK

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue

2013-02-15 Thread sven falempin
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.ukwrote: On 13/02/13 22:17, C V wrote: Sent: Wed, February 13, 2013 12:19:51 PM Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue The only 1 time I have been able to reproduce by hand is by trying it on a long-running

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue

2013-02-15 Thread sven falempin
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:28 AM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.ukwrote: On 13/02/13 22:17, C V wrote: Sent: Wed, February 13, 2013 12:19:51 PM Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue The only

[Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue

2013-02-13 Thread C V
We use dnsmasq in CloudStack [1] to serve dhcp requests to VM instances in a cloud environment. In a cloud environment, VMs come and go frequently so there dnsmasq gets reconfigured quite often. Specifically we update the files pointed to by dhcp-hostsfile and dhcp-optsfile using automation

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue

2013-02-13 Thread C V
Sent: Wed, February 13, 2013 12:19:51 PM Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue The only 1 time I have been able to reproduce by hand is by trying it on a long-running (many days) process in a cloud that was not being used actively. OK this part is reproducible and may