sorry test again
Have difficulties to get dnsmasq list mails throught spamfilter
On 29.02.2024 13.30, Knud via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Only test mail
As I having problems to receive mails from the list
Knud
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-d
Only test mail
As I having problems to receive mails from the list
Knud
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
I know only ISC forge project. Never tried to use it on dnsmasq, but in
theory it could be possible.
https://github.com/isc-projects/forge
On 21. 05. 23 17:05, Geert Stappers wrote:
Hello Shashi,
You might get two copies of this email.
In case you answer, please answer the mailinglist.
( Repl
Hello Shashi,
You might get two copies of this email.
In case you answer, please answer the mailinglist.
( Reply-To: is set to accomodate that )
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:42:24PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
> On 5/3/23 06:23, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
> > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:05 AM Simon Kelle
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 07:30:42PM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> On 29/12/2018 18:49, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > What is your favorite / good enough DHCP test client?
>
> dhcpcd - if there's a relevant DHCP RFC it doesn't support, it's a bug.
> https://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd
>
https://ro
On 29/12/2018 18:49, Geert Stappers wrote:
What is your favorite / good enough DHCP test client?
dhcpcd - if there's a relevant DHCP RFC it doesn't support, it's a bug.
https://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd
# dhcpcd -dBT4 xennet0
dhcpcd-7.0.8 starting
DUID 00:01:00:01:20:12:08:0c:fa:73:78:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 03:36:29PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:00:50PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 07:49:34PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What is your favorite / good enough DHCP test client?
> > >
> >
> > I use `
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:00:50PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 07:49:34PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is your favorite / good enough DHCP test client?
> >
>
> I use `dhtest` (
> https://sargandh.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/linux-dhcp-client-simula
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 07:49:34PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is your favorite / good enough DHCP test client?
>
I use `dhtest` (
https://sargandh.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/linux-dhcp-client-simulation-tool/ )
Test is `dhtest -m 00:00:11:22:33:44 -i eth0`
At server side is d
Hi,
What is your favorite / good enough DHCP test client?
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Leven en laten leven
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
jg tells me the test-ipv6.com site fails with dnssec and enabled on native ipv6.
disabling dnssec works.
anyone can confirm? get a log/packet capture?
--
Dave Täht
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists
On 21/04/12 13:43, Oliver Rath wrote:
Hi Simon,
ive tested the tftp-lowercase option
- runs fine as option in dnsmasq.conf
- runs fine as direct "--" parameter on command line
Great, thanks for testing that.
Unfortunatly the status-line "(lowercase)" is lost (line 637-640 in
dnsmasq.c).
Hi Simon,
ive tested the tftp-lowercase option
- runs fine as option in dnsmasq.conf
- runs fine as direct "--" parameter on command line
Unfortunatly the status-line "(lowercase)" is lost (line 637-640 in
dnsmasq.c).
Regards,
Oliver
___
Dnsmasq-dis
please ignore.
Simon.
Test post, please ignore.
I'm glad to hear this,
we're gonna try this here this week... We've got Catalysts 3750 Cisco
Switches... ill search arround if its possible to make them send the
circuitid and portid.
2010/2/22 Simon Kelley :
> ignacio.br...@belden.com wrote:
>> Simon Kelley wrote on 20/02/2010 18:48:41:
>>
>>>
ignacio.br...@belden.com wrote:
Simon Kelley wrote on 20/02/2010 18:48:41:
Try 2.53test10 and set the dhcp-proxy flag.
That removes the previous "don't match tags on unicast renew" behaviour,
and adds code to for every DHCP packet through the relay.
B^) OK, It works great now!
IPs are a
Simon Kelley wrote on 20/02/2010 18:48:41:
> Try 2.53test10 and set the dhcp-proxy flag.
>
> That removes the previous "don't match tags on unicast renew" behaviour,
> and adds code to for every DHCP packet through the relay.
>
B^) OK, It works great now!
I am now filtering broadcasts with ipt
ignacio.br...@belden.com wrote:
> Hello Simon, I tried the following on 2.53-test8:
>
> tag-if= set:fixedport, tag:puerto3, tag:switch1
> dhcp-range=net:switch1,net:puerto3,10.10.35.2,10.10.35.5,255.255.255.0
> #dhcp-option=net:switch1,net:puerto3,54,10.10.35.251
> dhcp-circuitid=puerto3,b9:06:00
richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>
> If you implement something like that, I'd suggest that the behavior of
> forcing server-id-override (--relay-masquerade perhaps) be applicable
> either to all relays or to only some leases based on matching the
> relay IP address against an explicit list (opti
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Resending this e-mail because it's very relevant to the broken
>> behavior noted by Ignacio in the test release.
>>
Ignacio, why not configure you switch to relay all ports? Then you can
block broa
richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Resending this e-mail because it's very relevant to the broken
behavior noted by Ignacio in the test release.
Ignacio, why not configure you switch to relay all ports? Then you can
block broadcasts without problems. You don't have to have special
configuration in d
Resending this e-mail because it's very relevant to the broken
behavior noted by Ignacio in the test release.
>>
>> Ignacio, why not configure you switch to relay all ports? Then you can
>> block broadcasts without problems. You don't have to have special
>> configuration in dnsmasq for all the po
ignacio.br...@belden.com wrote:
> Hello Simon, I tried the following on 2.53-test8:
>
> tag-if= set:fixedport, tag:puerto3, tag:switch1
> dhcp-range=net:switch1,net:puerto3,10.10.35.2,10.10.35.5,255.255.255.0
> #dhcp-option=net:switch1,net:puerto3,54,10.10.35.251
> dhcp-circuitid=puerto3,b9:06:00
Hello Simon, I tried the following on 2.53-test8:
tag-if= set:fixedport, tag:puerto3, tag:switch1
dhcp-range=net:switch1,net:puerto3,10.10.35.2,10.10.35.5,255.255.255.0
#dhcp-option=net:switch1,net:puerto3,54,10.10.35.251
dhcp-circuitid=puerto3,b9:06:00:00:01:01:01:03
dhcp-remoteid=switch1,00:06:
Santiago Zarate wrote:
Before Testing it, few questions:
Actually can i use this to tell dnsmask to give an ip address to machine
with a specific macaddress on a port of some particular switch? I mean,
afaict its all for a range of ips, not fixed adresses
Do i need a particular set up? and w
Before Testing it, few questions:
Actually can i use this to tell dnsmask to give an ip address to machine
with a specific macaddress on a port of some particular switch? I mean,
afaict its all for a range of ips, not fixed adresses
Do i need a particular set up? and where i can find documentatio
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/test-releases/dnsmasq-2.53test8.tar.gz
Cheers,
Simon.
28 matches
Mail list logo
