On 15/05/17 11:20, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
>
>
> On 15/05/17 11:06, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
>> * Simon Kelley [12.05.2017 08:33]:
>>> Oops. "It compiles - ship it" bites back.
>>>
>>> 2.77rc3 fixes this, and we're currently eating the dog-food chez Kelley.
>>
>> just to mention it, the loo
On 15/05/17 11:06, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
* Simon Kelley [12.05.2017 08:33]:
Oops. "It compiles - ship it" bites back.
2.77rc3 fixes this, and we're currently eating the dog-food chez Kelley.
just to mention it, the loopback-thingy is working fine now on my side with rc3.
Thanks a lot!
C
* Simon Kelley [12.05.2017 08:33]:
> Oops. "It compiles - ship it" bites back.
>
> 2.77rc3 fixes this, and we're currently eating the dog-food chez Kelley.
just to mention it, the loopback-thingy is working fine now on my side with rc3.
Thanks a lot!
bye, bastian
__
Oops. "It compiles - ship it" bites back.
2.77rc3 fixes this, and we're currently eating the dog-food chez Kelley.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 11/05/17 15:49, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
>
>
> On 10/05/17 22:31, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> Just committed a patch which should make this work again without
On 11/05/17 21:09, Simon Kelley wrote:
Oops. "It compiles - ship it" bites back.
2.77rc3 fixes this, and we're currently eating the dog-food chez Kelley.
Woof!
Currently building a LEDE release, assuming no obvious issue pops up, a
pull request into LEDE master will follow...and then...th
On 10/05/17 22:31, Simon Kelley wrote:
Just committed a patch which should make this work again without needing
--no-ping.
I've tagged it as 2.77rc2, so please could a LEDE package be built, and
this behaviour tested.
I tried rc2 and think there's a problem with DHCPv4 leasesie. It
does
Just committed a patch which should make this work again without needing
--no-ping.
I've tagged it as 2.77rc2, so please could a LEDE package be built, and
this behaviour tested.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 10/05/17 14:11, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Simon Kelley [10.05.2017 15:05]:
>> I wonder if this
On 10/05/17 14:11, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Simon Kelley [10.05.2017 15:05]:
>> I wonder if this is to do with the extension of the ping-test to more
>> cases. Please could you try adding
>>
>> no-ping
>>
>> to the config, and see if that improves things?
>
> thank you - yes, that works...now t
Yes. I'll look at putting code to suppress the ARP check. on loopback.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 10/05/17 14:11, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Simon Kelley [10.05.2017 15:05]:
>> I wonder if this is to do with the extension of the ping-test to more
>> cases. Please could you try adding
>>
>> no-ping
>>
>
* Simon Kelley [10.05.2017 15:05]:
> I wonder if this is to do with the extension of the ping-test to more
> cases. Please could you try adding
>
> no-ping
>
> to the config, and see if that improves things?
thank you - yes, that works...now the log shows:
dnsmasq-dhcp[28815]: DHCPREQUEST(lo)
I wonder if this is to do with the extension of the ping-test to more
cases. Please could you try adding
no-ping
to the config, and see if that improves things?
Cheers,
Simon.
On 10/05/17 11:56, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> here the relevant things with recent lede-project.org
>
> root@box:~ dn
here the relevant things with recent lede-project.org
root@box:~ dnsmasq -v
Dnsmasq version 2.77test5 Copyright (c) 2000-2016 Simon Kelley
Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP
no-DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack no-ipset no-auth no-DNSSEC no-ID
loop-detect inotify
# k
12 matches
Mail list logo
