Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

Hi, many thanks! - with the last two patches the build ran through. But to be complete, two "warnings" still remain: I'm using these options from IPFire GIT while building 'dnsmasq' (the latest 'lfs'-file and 'dnsmasq-Add-support-to-read-ISC-DHCP-lease-file.patch' are attached, all other

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/01/16 20:55, Matthias Andree wrote: > However, I can reproduce the issue on a vanilla 2.76test4, > apparently an #undef HAVE_DHCP isn't properly supported in > 2.76test4. > > Simon, do you need to comment out the do_script_run() calls in

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Good call. Fixed now. Cheers, Simon. On 06/01/16 19:39, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: > Simon, do_arp_script_run() does not have arguments, shouldn't ... > ? > > - while (do_arp_script_run(now)); + while (do_arp_script_run()); > > Lonnie > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

On Jan 6, 2016, at 12:04 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: > The do_script_run calls need to be removed from the compilation when > DHCP is not included. Since the scripting system used to just about > DHCP events, it was automatically removed from the compilation when > DHCP was

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

On Jan 5, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Matthias Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > On 05.01.2016 17:05, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: >> Hi Matthias, >> >> It seems you have disabled HAVE_DHCP with enabled HAVE_SCRIPT. >> >> Try disabling HAVE_SCRIPT in your build system... >> -- >>

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

Hi, On 05.01.2016 17:05, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: Hi Matthias, It seems you have disabled HAVE_DHCP with enabled HAVE_SCRIPT. Try disabling HAVE_SCRIPT in your build system... -- -e 's|#define HAVE_SCRIPT|//#define HAVE_SCRIPT|g' \ -- Thanks, but sorry, it seems that this worked only

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

On Jan 4, 2016, at 7:13 PM, Matthias Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > sorry, this will be rather long... > > I'm trying to compile 'dnsmasq 2.75' (for use with 'IPFire 2.17 (i586) - > core95') with > all available patches but I'm always runnning into errors. ... > cd

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

Am 05.01.2016 um 02:13 schrieb Matthias Fischer: > Hi, > > sorry, this will be rather long... > > I'm trying to compile 'dnsmasq 2.75' (for use with 'IPFire 2.17 (i586) - > core95') with > all available patches but I'm always runnning into errors. > Michael Tremer gave me the hint to ask here. >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

Hi, On 05.01.2016 20:11, Matthias Andree wrote: >Building always stops with the exact same errors, regardless if I use >'2.75' with a total of 41 patches by now, or the original >'2.75test4'-source. Does either compile without third-party patches? Until now, it made no difference compiling

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

Am 05.01.2016 um 21:01 schrieb Matthias Fischer: > Hi, > > On 05.01.2016 20:11, Matthias Andree wrote: >>> >Building always stops with the exact same errors, regardless if I use >>> >'2.75' with a total of 41 patches by now, or the original >>> >'2.75test4'-source. >> Does either compile without

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Hint needed: neither patched 'dnsmasq 2.75' nor '2.76test4' will compile

Hi, On 05.01.2016 21:55, Matthias Andree wrote: That's not "without all patches". Sorry, you're right of course... But as far as I know, the ISC patch is needed for IPFire. Best, Matthias ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list