It seems too cryptic to me. It seems to me usually overriding some name,
I would expect also other query types to be handled.
Could we support for example:
--address=/example.com/#,local
meaning the same value as another --local=/example.com/ specified? Just
on single line, only one domain per
On 31/08/2021 10:49, Dominik DL6ER wrote:
>
> Our conclusion was that the all-zero address (0.0.0.0 and [::])
> approach is the most effective one to block A and queries.
> For all other query types we recommend NODATA (i.e., a NOERROR reply
> with no answer records). Using this
Hey all,
[TL;DR: Check out the last paragraph]
d
Pi-hole, an free and open source ad-blocker, is based on dnsmasq. As
blocking is at our hearth, we've done studies on which blocking "modes"
would work the best in which situation. Our studies included serving
fixed addresses (to a self-hosted page
On 31.08.21 01:15, Trey Sis wrote:
I think he meant dropping the DNS request.
dropping the DNS request would result in request retransmission.
returning answer is a better idea, although we can discuss if it's supposed
to be all-zero, NXDOMAIN, or NODATA (SERVFAIL would result in
I think he meant dropping the DNS request.
On 8/31/2021 0:39, wkitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/30/21 6:00 PM, rrandom via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Thank you. Btw why dnsmasq redirects that connections but doesn't
just drop
them? Honestly, I don't know much about networking but simple
dropping
On 8/30/21 6:00 PM, rrandom via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Thank you. Btw why dnsmasq redirects that connections but doesn't just drop
them? Honestly, I don't know much about networking but simple dropping seems
like easier for resources.
dropping connections is outside of dnsmasq's purview...
Thank you. Btw why dnsmasq redirects that connections but doesn't just drop
them? Honestly, I don't know much about networking but simple dropping seems
like easier for resources.
On 30/08/21 12:11PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 30/08/2021 11:06, rrandom via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > Hello. In
On 8/30/2021 13:15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
On 30.08.21 13:06, rrandom via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Hello. In one of the dnsmasq filterlists I found that domains
redirected
to `#` like `address=/example.com/#`
Wouldn't it be better to return NXDOMAIN instead of
On 30.08.21 13:06, rrandom via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Hello. In one of the dnsmasq filterlists I found that domains redirected
to `#` like `address=/example.com/#`
this is in changelog for 2.80:
Implement --address=/example.com/# as (more efficient) syntactic
sugar for
On 30/08/2021 11:06, rrandom via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> Hello. In one of the dnsmasq filterlists I found that domains redirected to
> `#` like `address=/example.com/#`
>
> But in man I read:
>
>> The special server address '#' means, "use the standard servers", so
>>
10 matches
Mail list logo
